The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 August 20. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. As noted here, PD-Art only applies to 2D objects which this one is not. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Per the referenced page, looks like this image does not have a free license release, and can only, in effect, be used via fair use. Steel1943 ( talk) 02:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Similarly to the other discussion, the main question is whether it is applicable to use {{ PD-Art}}. Which is not unlikely. -- HarJIT ( talk) 16:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Dubious free license claim on watermarked image. Same user had a ton of images deleted in 2008 for similar issues. Not sure there's a speedy tag that applies but plz ping and advise if there is and I'll tag the rest as that. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete the medal image. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:36, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
For the "09:08, 25 October 2007" image only. The medal might be copyrighted. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 04:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 09:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
missing verifiable source FASTILY 09:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Per C:COM:TOO#Canada, I'm thinking this logo is not unique enough for copyright in Canada, and thus should be moved to Commons. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 August 20. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Something is amiss with this image; the image doesn't match the description. If you click on the third image in the gallery of /info/en/?search=Rai_stones, you will see this image of Rais. If you then click View on Commons you will see the correct image for this description. Grika Ⓣ 22:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)