The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I thought The Wachowskis could be considered not just two people but also a kind of brand, and that a directorial credit could be considered a representative image of that brand. But I don't feel strongly about this and I knew it was a slightly unusual use of non-free media.
WanderingWanda (they/them) (
t/
c)
01:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - the subject are two people and could be replaced by an image of the two individuals
WP:NFCC#1, and there is no content in the article support the uploader's contention the two are a brand, so the usage also fails
WP:NFCC#8. --
Whpq (
talk)
19:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
A discussion on the talk page determined that, currently, there are no free-to-use images of the two that would be appropriate to use as the lead image. Again I don't feel strongly about this, but I guess I don't understand why it's appropriate to illustrate the television show Cheers with a TV title that says "Cheers", but you can't illustrate the directors The Wachowskis with a TV title that says "Directed by The Wachowskis".
WanderingWanda (they/them) (
t/
c)
21:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment: there may need to be a broader conversation about whether TV articles should use logos or posters as lead images (the MoS currently recommends posters but it feels like logos have become more popular.)
WanderingWanda (they/them) (
t/
c)
18:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. It's not in the infobox, so it's clearly not used to identify the topic Russian Doll. For whatever else reason it's supposedly used,it doesn't have the necessary sourced critical commentary; it's purely decorative. I don't really care whether TV series articles use a logo or a poster; I don't have the expertise to tell which is more representative. But only one such image can convincingly be used to identify the topic in the infobox. The rest need critical sourced discussion in order to qualify. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs)
21:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete@
Sebastian James: thanks for pinging me. I would say to delete because it is not on the infobox as stated on the rationale, and also the article does not state anything about the appearance or content on the poster, therefore not being used for critical commentary. --
𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞🗨️🖊️23:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.