The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. This file is not in the public domain, as the
source was written in the 1990s by a currently (as of nominating)
living person. In addition, the file is unused and will not see use for a long time as character lists do not use images for each character. -BRAINULATOR9 (
TALK)00:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Dubious "formula" with no use in real-world mathematics (despite its inventor spamming it all over the Internet to boost his ego); see
[1]Equinox◑19:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The meme is a minor matter in the biography. At the time of nomination, there is literally a single sentence about Xi being compared to Pooh, and no actual commentary about the image itself. That really falls well short of the significant context that would be expected to support the inclusion of a non-free image. --
Whpq (
talk)
01:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The meme is a significant example of ChiCom censorship surrounding matters deemed disrespectful or irreverent to Xi Jinping. As Abzeronow said it's difficult to convey via text only and I have included this on other articles pertaining to PRC censorship.
EverettTheUrban (
talk)
07:04, 24 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - according to
Template:Non-free film screenshot, the only explicitly allowed fair use of screenshots from a copyrighted film is "for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents", and its current usage to illustrate an internet meme or censorship is not covered by that rationale. There are plenty of freely licensed images for
Xi Jinping, and as far as Chinese censorship is concerned, the Winnie the Pooh incident is extremely minor. The blocking of Google and Facebook etc. is of far more consequence. -
Zanhe (
talk)
18:03, 24 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.