The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
likely copyvio, uploaded by user with a history of bad uploads, no proof of ownership RF23 ( talk) 11:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:11, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
No permission from the photographer, nor evidence of who that was. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:43, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Should be deleted. Although a Fair Use claim has been made, this magazine cover of a living celebrity does not appear to meet NFCC. The stated purpose for Fair Use ("The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work") is not met as there's no discussion or critical commentary about the magazine cover itself in the article Michael Acton Smith. JGHowes talk 23:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)