Wikipedia:files For Discussion 2016 May 15

< May 14	May 16 >

May 15

File:Manic monday UK.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 02:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

There is currently a US image of the single Manic Monday by the American band, The Bangles. Administrators normally do not allow extra images; this is no exception. Only one cover, the US one, is needed to identify the single and the band's nationality. George Ho ( talk) 04:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Oppose - As long as {{ Extra album cover}} exists this is legitimate. Take your fight there. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 16:19, 21 May 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Secondarywaltz: Many administrators have enforced rules to not allow more than one front cover without discussing the artwork itself or more about the UK release. Also, as long as the US front cover is used, omitting the UK image may not affect readers' grasp of the whole song itself, "Manic Monday", and its separate release into media and radio airplay. Why else keeping the UK image besides... its mere appearance? -- George Ho ( talk) 22:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Secondarywaltz: the existence of {{ Extra album cover}} implies nothing about the acceptability of extra non-free covers as such. Acceptability is assessed viz. the WP:NFCC. Indeed, the template doc says: "When using this template, please ensure you comply with the non-free content criteria. This includes not using multiple non-free images when one would suffice." – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 21:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC) reply

OK destructionists! I'm being the devil's advocate here. Since the nominator is on a mission to remove every occurrence of an alternate version of an album cover, they might as well have that subtemplate deleted. Isn't there something more productive you could do? Secondarywaltz ( talk) 15:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Here's proof of my productivity, Secondarywaltz: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 108#Adding extra cover arts in album and singles articles. I tried to convince the administrators to accept extra cover arts, but they still believe that having extra covers is unnecessary and does not help readers understand the song/single itself. That's why I'm doing this now. George Ho ( talk) 18:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Well why the hell are going against your beliefs to do this? Makes no sense to take on a deletetion project that have argued against. Why don't you just let it be? Secondarywaltz ( talk) 18:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I've done the same to extra covers of Beat It at FFD, where no one else participated. If you are desperate, why not create another central discussion at WT:NFC or WP:VPP? This matter was discussed over and over, and the results have been still the same as always. George Ho ( talk) 18:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Secondarywaltz: It looks to me like User:George Ho is abiding by the consensus at which the community has arrived, despite that he does not agree personally with it, which is highly laudable. Stifle ( talk) 08:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep Passes WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 as stated on Template:Infobox album, "An alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion.", which could be logically used for singles. The current consensus for alternate images on album/single articles are that the alternate cover has to be significantly different from the original, widely distributed and/or replacing the original would pass the criteria for identification or an alternate image that is the subject of sourced critical commentary about the image would also be acceptable. Having charted on the UK chart equally the U.S. peak shows it was widely distributed. Aspects ( talk) 03:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Aspects and Secondarywaltz: Must a reader understand the song by looking at an overseas image? A reader can already understand the song's worldwide release without more than one non-free image. How would omitting the UK affect readers' understanding of the song's prevalent release? The UK front cover is not well discussed in the article by reliable sources. Also, the image has the same purpose as the US image. Isn't one non-free front cover enough? George Ho ( talk) 06:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Look, I don't really care. The fact that you say "overseas" is the problem you have. The whole point is that Wikipedia is for worldwide consumption, not just where you live. Different covers often illustrate differences in marketing, cultural and musical tastes between countries or regions. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 17:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

In that logic, no one would mind adding a Korean or Japanese edition? I did try to add a Japanese cover art of one of Madonna's singles, but IndianBio would not accept my proposal but deemed it an unnecessary another of visual identifications. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Also, Aspects, looking different isn't significant enough. George Ho ( talk) 19:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

English language Wikipedia and countries was redundant for me to mention. If looking different was not significant, why would record companies go to such lengths to package their product differently depending on the market. It is very important! Secondarywaltz ( talk) 20:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

If that's "important", here you go: some covers might have controversial artwork. Covers are mentioned trivially. Probably we should avoid synthesizing the sources about sleeves, especially whoever is not The Bangles. Speaking of The Bangles, I found the source about the US image. I could not find sources about the UK one. In my theory, probably before the digital age, the resources were probably primitive, and distribution was regional in every area. However, that's just my theory. George Ho ( talk) 21:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Found another source about distribution of singles in general. George Ho ( talk) 21:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

To put the sources together, probably my theory would be affirmed. Picture sleeves were probably costly, so generic sleeves were enough. Europeans were still able to receive such picture sleeves, and the Brits probably began to distribute singles into picture sleeves like the Europeans. One time, there was a sleeve shortage (?). But that was before compact discs debuted in early 1980s and became more popular over the years (?) probably. However, CD singles didn't become popular until the 1990s. As said before, very little sources discuss the sleeves of "Manic Monday". -- George Ho ( talk) 21:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Again. I don't really care. I'm just correcting your misconceptions. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 20:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Oh Wikipedia, you are so funny - and so sad. It's not as if this matters one little bit, and yet it is debated with great sincerity and pomposity. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 21:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply
- Of course it matters; we're trying to run a free encyclopedia. Stifle ( talk) 08:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  - @ Stifle: An encyclopedia that is full of error and recentism, because it is controlled by the consensus of youthful computer centric editors. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 14:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Delete, when we actually read WP:NFCC#8 we see it's clear. This image does not add to readers' understanding of this article and its removal would not be detrimental to that understanding. It's just another bit of decoration. Full disclosure: I was canvassed to this debate by the nominator. Stifle ( talk) 08:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Delete per nominator and Stifle. No way this passes any ounce of non-free criteria. — IB ^{[
Poke ]} 08:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bangles Going Down 1984.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete 1984, keep 1986 (for now) to replace side label, lacks WP:NFCC#8 rationale for more than one identifying artwork, see note about merging the whole shebang czar 16:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Both images are used for Going Down to Liverpool. I uploaded the image of the US vinyl single. Even when the song was not charted in the US, the song was recorded by originally Katrina and The Waves but later covered by the American band. Although the song is totally British, the US image is needed to indicate the band's nationality. Therefore, the UK and the re-release image are not necessary. George Ho ( talk) 04:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete File:Bangles Going Down 1984.jpeg since the alternate cover was not widely distributed. Keep File:The-Bangles-Going-Down-To-Liverpool 1986.jpg since this image was more widely distributed as can be seen by this version charting higher than the original. Aspects ( talk) 03:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The 1986 reissue cover is ineffective to readers' understanding of the whole song itself, and there is already a US side label adequately identifying the song. George Ho ( talk) 06:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete File:Bangles Going Down 1984.jpeg but Keep File:The-Bangles-Going-Down-To-Liverpool 1986.jpg. Use it to replace the US side label which is not particularly helpful visually, whereas the 1986 pic is higher quality and more recognizable. Moreover, the 1986 pic is most relevant because it corresponds to the highest-selling single release. SteveStrummer ( talk) 00:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Steve, both images are from UK. How would anyone outside the UK recognize any of those images the most? George Ho ( talk) 05:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC) reply

It doesn't need to be recognized ("remembered") outside the UK, it needs to be recognized ("identified") by all readership. The photo's purpose is to be illustrative of the topic, which in this case is a hit single in the UK, most famously the 1986 edition. SteveStrummer ( talk) 22:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The Bangles aren't British, Steve, and using solely the UK reissue image would make readers think that the US single release of the song was only promotional, not commercial (e.g. Down So Long). Or should I say, people would assumed the song was not commercially distributed individually in the US. Or, without a caption, people would think that the image is of the US picture sleeve. If US image is still used, all readers can already grasp the history of single releases (e.g. reissues) and the chart history without the UK images by reading the whole article. I'm sure that the US image of the initial release is adequate enough, even when the US release had a generic sleeve. I'm unsure whether you are curious about history of releases in general, but I'll tell you anyway. Record companies distributed vinyl singles in either generic or picture sleeves. However, picture sleeves for vinyl singles were more costly than generic sleeves. Also, CDs weren't popular at the time of the releases. I read the article about a sleeve shortage in 1973, but CDs didn't exist back then. George Ho ( talk) 00:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Aspects and Steve: I recently added File:901 December 1987.jpg (OTRS permitted) in Going Down to Liverpool since identifying the band is the concern here. George Ho ( talk) 09:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

That image is irrelevant to the article and shouldn't be used there. What's needed is the image which best identifies the topic, which is (to repeat) a certain hit single in the UK. That'd be File:The-Bangles-Going-Down-To-Liverpool 1986.jpg. SteveStrummer ( talk) 16:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Steve, the song peaked at #51 or #52 in the UK in 1986. Meanwhile, it fared better at number 20ish in Ireland, so would this Irish side label do? George Ho ( talk) 16:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No, because it's not the best image we have available. George, we have to do what's good for the article, not our arguments. SteveStrummer ( talk) 18:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Steve: I don't see how using an overseas edition is good for the article about the song made in America, but then again, I can't convince you otherwise. If it were good for the article, that would depend on readers' understanding of the song... or single. Speaking of readers, what about what is good for them? George Ho ( talk) 18:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Wait, Steve... The song was originally made by the British. The song wasn't initially successful. Another recording by the Americans wasn't either, even when it hit the charts worldwide. #51 in UK? How is that a success? Anyway, I figure that the recording is American-made, despite the song's origins. So I think that the US side label is enough already unless someone wants some picture sleeve from overseas to be the infobox image for mainly its looks regardless. Also, people searched for products by side labels because most of the singles had just generic sleeves back then. The side labels might have safer fair use than picture sleeves probably. I couldn't use a B-side side label of Katrina and the Waves's recording because theirs didn't hit the charts. Therefore, we are stuck arguing about which picture sleeve to keep and which other to delete since Katrina's is not as prominent as it should have been. George Ho ( talk) 18:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Closer note: This is all a moot point if there aren't even enough sources to warrant this topic's separation from its parent album articles. I get that the original EP doesn't have an article, but if this is truly best known as part of All Over the Place (The Bangles album), it should just be covered there (pun somewhat intended). czar 16:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moving Pictures - What About Me single.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 07:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

This image is used in What About Me (Moving Pictures song). The topic is Australian-related; the band who recorded the song is Australian. However, this image is American. I added an image of the Australian single into the article to help readers understand the release more. Therefore, the American image must be deleted. George Ho ( talk) 07:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep Passes WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 as stated on Template:Infobox album, "An alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion.", which could be logically used for singles. The current consensus for alternate images on album/single articles are that the alternate cover has to be significantly different from the original, widely distributed and/or replacing the original would pass the criteria for identification or an alternate image that is the subject of sourced critical commentary about the image would also be acceptable. Having charted on two U.S. charts and a year-ending U.S. chart show that it is widely distributed. Aspects ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

See further discussion at #File:Manic monday UK.jpg. Also, being charted in the US is not enough to justify the US image, IMHO. The sources, while searching them, have not discussed the US image. George Ho ( talk) 21:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

By the way, aspects, you have used the same arguments as before. George Ho ( talk) 10:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete. Fails NFCC#3a and #8 when we actually read the criteria: the image does not add substantially to the readers' understanding of the article and its removal would not be detrimental to that understanding. Infobox template guidelines do not override policy. Full disclosure: I was canvassed to come to this page by the nominator. Stifle ( talk) 08:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kavitha gold.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Claimed to be from http://kavitha.gold/gallery.php although I can't find it there. No evidence of permission from that website. Stefan2 ( talk) 09:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete as there is no evidence that the uploader holds the copyright. The image is one several on http://kavitha.gold/gallery-chy.php nd the footer states " © Copyright 2013. Kavitha Gold & Diamonds OTTAPALAM" and there is no indication of free licensing. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Mig Coffee Mixers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Mig Super Coffee Mixers 2013-2014 Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alaskamilkmen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barangay Ginebra Kings logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GlobalPort Batang Pier.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GlobalPort Batang Pier 2013.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Welcoat Dragons logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rain or Shine Elasto Painters logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mobiline Phone Pals logo 90s.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Talk N' Text. Phone Pals logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Talk 'N Text Tropang Texters logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

That other stuff exists that breaks the non-free content criteria is not an argument for allowing this article to do so. This one fails WP:NFCC#8. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 14:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TNT Tropang Texters - 2015 logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Old logo that is now no longer being used as the primary means of identification and instead is being used decoratively. Whpq ( talk) 10:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The nominator may have overlooked other sports team articles. Most NBA team article contains historical logos, which are also used decoratively instead as primary means of identification. I think singling out PBA teams because it is not known widely outside the Philippines is a bit of discrimination. - WayKurat ( talk) 10:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Feel free to nominate other instances of improperly used non-free content in other places. -- Whpq ( talk) 10:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Exhibition Place Carillon bell specifications.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

This isn't self work, but looks like a source document. OK for Commons? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete Looks like original research, so it shouldn't appear in Exhibition Place Carillon, and I can't think of any other foreseeable use of the file. The copyright tag also seems to be wrong. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 11:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emma-Rosa Dias 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Interior of M&M World in New York City, 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kothamangalam Valiya Pally.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The File has been updated.Previously Uploaded a copy which was kept from Facebook.

There is now different EXIF. I'm not sure if that copy constitutes evidence of control of the Facebook account. I would recommend you to prove ownership of the Facebook account per WP:IOWN. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Comment The user has a lot of suspicious uploads (low-res images, image with border with Facebook metadata, up-close shot of Pope Francis, photos credited to other user names). I recommend a further review of them. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HunDry.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:HunDry.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC) This accusation is outrageous. I own the file, if it came from facebook, it was my file to upload. Should this be called into question I will simply upload the original from my camera. reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Preparation of Kongbul.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ErnstYoungCLE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:ErnstYoungCLE.jpg. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

This accusation is outrageous. I own the file, if it came from facebook, it was my file to upload. Should this be called into question I will simply upload the original from my camera.

See WP:IOWN. If you publish a file outside Wikipedia before you upload it to Wikipedia, then you need to provide evidence that you are the copyright holder. If you are the user who posted the file to Facebook, then you should be able to find the page on Facebook where the image was posted and prove that the Facebook account belongs to you. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vew-do 1992.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Melting Rain Smouler In Mt. Pleasant, Utah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Statue of Queen Victoria, South Shields.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Statue fo Queen Victoria, Derby Square, Liverpool.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:International Centre, XLRI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Noman Çelebicihan Batallion.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Higher institute of ballet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pamela McColl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 20:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user.

Additionally, this is a derivative work. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plaza del Caribe entrance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pallaso Mayanja.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pallaso Mayanja.jpeg. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Queue Line at Canada's Wonderland, June 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrew Oye Composer.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HappyLeafGuy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Previously published on Facebook (according to EXIF). Stefan2 ( talk) 13:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Radio Excellence Award Mast Fm 103 Faisalabad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:U-17 Squad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Entrance to the auditorium.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prayaanacivil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The EXIF "special instructions" consists of "FBMD" followed by a long hexadecimal number. This means that the image comes from some unidentified page on Facebook, see c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata). Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of The President Of The Philippines (1946).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist czar 16:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 26#File:Flag_of_The_President_Of_The_Philippines_(1946).png

File is uploaded as non-free, but I'm not sure if it should be public domain (PD) instead. Many similar files have been uploaded to Commons as PD ( c:Category:Presidential Standard of the Philippines) including a free version of this file as c:File:Presidential Standard of the Philippines (1946-1948).svg. If the file needs to be uploaded locally to Wikipedia as non-free, then it's current use in Flag of the President of the Philippines#Historical uses fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 ( WP:NFG) and the file should be removed and replaced with the Commons version. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 13:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The problem is that we have a copyright tag, {{ Non-free Philippines government}}, which says that files like this are unfree whereas Commons has a copyright tag, {{ PD-PhilippinesGov}}, which says that the same files are in the public domain. If the file is unfree, then the use needs to comply with WP:NFCC, but if it is free, then its use is not restricted by WP:NFCC, and I'm not sure if we can determine what's correct without help from an expert on Philippines copyright law. On a related note, there are a couple of Philippines Government seals which are used outside the article namespace, but since I'm not sure if they are free or unfree, I'm not sure if I should remove them from those pages per WP:NFCC#9 or not. For the moment, I've left those files alone. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 16:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply
- Until it's proven that they are free, we are to treat them as if they are unfree. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 16:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  - This image is from malacanang.gov.ph (Presidential Museum and Library - Biography of Pres. Manuel Roxas) and is in public domain. The website states below, "All content is in the public domain unless otherwise stated." -- J-Ronn ( talk) 07:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply
    - Just as Wikipedia and Commons are confused by the contradictory tags {{ Non-free Philippines government}} / {{ PD-PhilippinesGov}}, it's possible that the government website from which the image comes also is confused by the confusing law. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 13:55, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply
      - That's true, but it's a rather cynical view that the Philippine Presidential Museum (or the Office of the President for that matter, given that the website hosts the same message and similar content) has poorer understanding of the Philippine copyright law than a bunch of Wikipedians. In general, we don't assume that people who license stuff have no understanding about licensing. By that logic, every CC-BY picture from Flickr is potentially a copyvio because users are confused by law (say, the elementary fact that copyright is exclusive to the copyright holder; because let's face it most people, even Flickr users have no idea about copyright). I think we should assume that rather than being confused by, the Philippine government is abiding by the law. If there is someone who should be assumed to know the law, it's the executive office that is tasked with implementing legislation. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 14:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply
        In what way is the statement on that website any different from {{ Flickr-public domain mark}}? -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:48, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply
    - Keep PD per above. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 14:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dean Sedfrey M. Candelaria.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Dead source, license cannot be verified Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete Archive.org doesn't have that page archived. The image actually appears to be a photoshopped version of an image on this page with the logo behind his head changed. The page I linked to is marked as copyrighted. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clifford Sadlier VC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete: issue is with the American side of this copyright, insufficient publication/authorship information czar 16:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Source coypright notice in image, (which is misleading if this is a genuine WWI image.) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The fact there's a copyright notice within the image doesn't mean that it is still within copyright. It may indeed be misleading because it is wrong. Can there be any doubt that the image was taken when Sadlier was in the AIF and thus before 1919 when he was discharged ? If we can't be sure that the image was taken in Australia (and therefore copyright free since it was taken before 1955) then shall we rely upon the fact that the Battye Library is the photographic section of the State Library of Western Australia and shall we then regard it as "E1" type material under Australian PD being material such as a State Government held photograph "first published more than 50 years ago, or if made before 1 May 1969, first made more than 50 years ago". It's PD in Australia, was PD in Australia before 1 January 1946 and thus is PD in the US.- Sticks 66 03:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

So the 'library' copyright tag needs cropping, as this is clearly PD-scan or simmilar, Thanks :) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Why ? The fact that there is a fallacious copyright tag on the shot doesn't make it non-PD. Cropping the shot or not doesn't change anything. It's PD as a question of fact.- Sticks 66

Spelling is "similar".- Sticks 66 13:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

It changes compliance with WP:WATERMARK. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 13:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

According to the file information page, this photo was taken in 2009, which is unlikely considering that the subject of the photograph died 45 years earlier. The linked copy has a copyright notice: "© LISWA 2001 Battye Library All Rights Reserved". The year in a copyright notice is supposed to be the year of publication, so the copyright notice suggests that this was first published in 2001. No evidence of prior publication has been provided. According to c:COM:HIRTLE, the United States copyright to an Australian photograph taken during Clifford Sadlier's life time expires 120 years after it was taken or on 1 January 2048 (whichever is later) if this is a work for hire, or 70 years after the name of the photographer (the photo is signed but I can't read the name) or on 1 January 2048 (whichever is later) if this isn't a work for hire. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 13:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cliff Rankin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Jenks24 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

No author data or date of publication, Not a photo so can't apply PD under the pre 1945 rule. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Please delete. Replacement image has been uploaded ( File:CliffRankin.png). Jevansen ( talk) 09:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Copra workers 1948.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist czar 17:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 26#File:Copra_workers_1948.jpg

This post dates the 1946 cut-off for a 50 year term to 1996 (URAA date). However, it's claimed it's a "Commonwealth" image. Is there an OTRS on file about the Australian Govt not asserting copyright in the US on expired images? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ConcordiaCricket1940s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Date is not precise enough to determine if the 1946 cutoff applies. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cronulla beach pre 1950s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Needs a more precise date to determine if the 1946 cut-off applies. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dioxin from trichlorphenol.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as {{ PD-chem}} ★ Bigr Tex 15:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Assuming that this image is copyrightable (the individual chemical images fall under {{ PD-chem}} and chemical reactions are not copyrightable either) it fails WP:NFCC#1 since it can easily be replaced with an user-made image of the chemicals, user-made text and arrows. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Looks like {{ PD-chem}}, so the file should probably be retagged instead of deleted. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 17:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Probably. One wonders if the style of the arrows and the like might give rise to a copyright claim as "sufficiently complex in aggregate". I am not convinced myself but the creativity treshold is low... Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I agree that it is intrinsically PD ({{ PD-chem}}). But it's also not up to current quality standards (see MOS:CHEM) so it should be redrawn from scratch, which would solve Jo-Jo Eumerus's ToO concern. Retagging it as PD would allow it to go to commons, but commons already has File:Seveso_reaction.PNG (and several other similar) that are of higher quality. So I say delete, because I don't see a need for a low-quality image of the same idea (content concern) regardless of license. DMacks ( talk) 06:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hexachlorophenesynthesis.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as {{ PD-chem}} ★ Bigr Tex 15:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Assuming that this image is copyrightable (the individual chemical images fall under {{ PD-chem}} and chemical reactions are not copyrightable either) it fails WP:NFCC#1 since it can easily be replaced with an user-made image of the chemicals, user-made text and arrows. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Looks like {{ PD-chem}}, so the file should probably be retagged instead of deleted. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 17:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Probably. One wonders if the style of the arrows and the like might give rise to a copyright claim as "sufficiently complex in aggregate". I am not convinced myself but the creativity treshold is low... Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I agree that it is intrinsically PD ({{ PD-chem}}). But it's also low quality (see MOS:CHEM) so it should be redrawn from scratch, which would solve Jo-Jo Eumerus's ToO concern. Retagging it as PD would allow it to go to commons, but commons already has File:Producciohexaclorofe2.JPG that is...differently low quality. So I say delete, because I don't see a need for a second low-quality image of the same idea (content concern) regardless of license. As soon as someone creates a MOSish image of this idea, both would probably get deleted for content-quality reasons here and/or on commons, so no sense delaying that outcome. DMacks ( talk) 06:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:G Almeida.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gb3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unencyclopedic. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GbmAirForce.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused edited logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GBRFlagGreyscale.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gbrsmgs1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gautam Mishra.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaurav khandelwal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GateRadio-CanadaJams Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GaryGad Asleep.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garrison Brothers.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Games-for-change-logo-150x.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gamecubedisc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused low quality photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gamercizeps2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused photo. No evidence of permission. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gameinsightlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep Hisotric {{ PD-logo}} of notable company, Game Insight. ★ Bigr Tex 04:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GameGearlogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Game room of Doc Sab.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gallery HD.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Galleries of Justice logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep No longer orphaned. ★ Bigr Tex 04:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GALClogo541-noTag.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaelmorel wikipic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. Screenshot from a film. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gajalakshan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabrielsfallenwebpage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabriele449logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabriela - N.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Comment This photo appears to be of Gabriela N. May need verification of permission, however. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gabriela (11).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Comment This photo appears to be of Gabriela N. May need verification of permission, however. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GC Locator.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused map. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gc2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused low quality flag. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GCHS.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gcicsingapore.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused photo. No evidence licensing is correct. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:41, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GCMD-Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GCMock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gdb11.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gdedwin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gee Money St. Maarten 2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Comment This is Gee Money. Do we need better verification or is this promotional account obviously him? Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GEE ROCK SMALL.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused promotional photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geeke2d.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geetar2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Generate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeneralStaffBC.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused insignia. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:General lewis.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Generalwarning sing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Genevieve 075.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused promotional photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GennyDauti.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geno map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused map. No evidence permission has been given by the National Geographic Society. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GenralZ.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Genographic map.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused map. No evidence permission has been given by the National Geographic Society. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Genographic map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused map. No evidence permission has been given by the National Geographic Society. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geoff1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geoffdann.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geoffrey-cohen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geoffrey Kleinman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geoff and peter .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeoffRose2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeokingBB.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user image. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geometrislogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geordies.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Foreman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused old screenshot. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Jarred.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 20:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Weak keep Photo also includes a younger George Clooney -- could theoretically be useful even if not the best quality. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Sandy3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George youth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George342011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 20:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Very weak keep? The man in the cowboy hat seems to be George Strait. Terrible quality though. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I can verify it's authenticity - I've seen worse quality photos on Wikipedia. Check out Larry Brown (basketball)'s photo.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeorgeBenson&David.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 20:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Weak keep George Benson but terrible quality. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgefitzhugh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 21:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gerdau logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Superceded by File:Gerdau logo (2011).svg. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gercek pop logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geotalk.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Question by User:PETEYTHEREF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: resolved czar 17:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Can someone help me understand why a photo that I own is being deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PETEYTHEREF ( talk • contribs) 2016-05-23T14:32:17 reply

@ PETEYTHEREF: If you see above at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_May_15#File:George342011.jpg, it was because the nominator thought the image was an unused personal photo. I voted weak keep because I see that one of the people pictured is George Strait. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Georgeradutu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Getmeoutofherecover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused user graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GhostAndSunWhite.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GI Joe logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gi screen shot market.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused screenshot. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gibin Mathew Chemmannar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gibbler1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gigantic Black Drum.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: tagged for Commons czar 17:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Weak keep Could be used to illustrate fishing of this species. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gij.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gikoneko mugcup.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused graphic. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GimmeMorePetition.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Unencyclopedic. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gjoslogo2006a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused logo. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep A free historic logo of a notable podcast, Gareth Jones on Speed. ★ Bigr Tex 05:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Comment Is this actually a free logo? It has some gas station logos, a variety of colors, etc. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Drakkar is the building the French were using for a barracks, 1983.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Invalid copyright tag: not a proposed building. Also debatable whether a picture of the building is needed under WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Billington family.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

See WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Well this is kind of embarrassing, having two of my pictures nominated at the same time. I may have misunderstood the criteria but I personally definitely believe that it's just as nessasary to have a picture of family members in a family article as it is to have of a person in a biographical article. *Treker ( talk) 23:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete: Problematic in terms of WP:NFCC#8: "Billington family" is neither one nor all four of those individuals so using this (in contrast to any other combination) is not quite the same thing as e.g. how a cover page is used to identify a book on its article (or indeed a portrait of a given individual). WP:NFCC#3: Most of these individuals have articles of their own where some these photos are already present. WP:FREER: at least three of these individuals have free photos of them ( File:James-Billington photo.jpg, File:William-Billington.jpg, File:The British Bulldog.jpg). Using a non-free image of Davey Boy clearly fails WP:NFCC#1 and shoehorning non-free images into a montage that contains free ones violates WP:NFG: "User-created montages containing non-free images should be avoided". – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 02:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I didn't know about the montage rule when I uploaded the picture. I figured they would just be covered under the historical photo rule since both are deceased. I asked a while ago on the copyright question page and it seemed like it would be fine if it was a historical photograph. Sorry.

I've never violated a copyright rule before. Will I receive some kind of punishment now? *Treker ( talk) 02:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

No, the picture will get deleted and we can continue to improve this wonderful encyclopedia.

The montage rule isn't set in stone, they "should be avoided" but I'd imagine there are acceptable uses (I just can't figure one, especially when existing non-free images are used and re-uploaded). – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 03:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Ah, ok. That's a big relief. Thanks for answering. Also, you just taught me how to make a smiley,

. Never seen that before on Wikipedia so far. Cool. *Treker ( talk) 03:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hart family.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

See WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Ryan Dunnigan, Forensic-Clinical Psychologist and Threat Assessor.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr. Ryan Dunnigan - Wikipedia Bio.pdf. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.