The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus. Questions about the copyright status will need a new FFD, what is here is not enough to make any decision. If more questions come please start a new FFD. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC) reply

File:JodeeRich.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luff21 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal photo. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep Now used in Jodee Rich.  ★  Bigr Tex 18:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I'm skeptical the uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 23:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. The concerns appear to have been addressed. The images in the Post article directly support critical commentary specific to the music videos, which seems to support non-free use under our criteria. Feel free to renominate if you believe the updated non-free use rationales are still not sufficient. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 16:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:It's Oh So Quiet scene.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bleff ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Volumen-HyperBallad-020.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bleff ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

These two video screenshots were originally used only in their respective song articles which is within policy. However, they have also been added to Post (Björk album) without a specific and separate use rationale for the album article thus failing WP:NFCC#10. More importantly, this usage fails WP:NFCC#3 (minimal use) as this is not minimal use there are links to the individual song articles where these video screenshots are present. Recommend they be removed from the Post article and retained on the individual song articles. Whpq ( talk) 18:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I think the screenshots not only add information in the footer, but also support what is written in the section. Now they have their own use rationale, and have been removed for the individual song articles as they are more useful here.-- Bleff ( talk) 07:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; the original text is PD-old, since the quote comes from a person who's been dead for 144 years. Nyttend ( talk) 00:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Joe Howe1.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bwark ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Appears to be a derivative of non-free content (billboard) FASTILY 22:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC) reply

See also previous deletion discussion here. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

According to the FoP-Canada tag at Commons, Freedom of Panorama in Canada does not include "advertising hoardings" (which is a billboard). Therefore the question is whether the design on the billboard exceeds Threshold of originality#Canada, specifically a "modicum of creativity". I would tend to agree that it exceeds TOO, and therefore offer a Weak Delete, but would appreciate hearing from some of the other FFD regulars.  ★  Bigr Tex 21:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

BigrTex is correct - above TOO. Delete. Kelly ^hi! 07:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC) reply

I uploaded this photo just over 8 years ago (Aug. 8, 2008) and so far, the sky hasn't fallen. Why fret about this now? Are you editors or are you police officers? Bwark ( talk) 23:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

I should add that the building where this billboard was displayed has since been demolished and the billboard is no longer there. Bwark ( talk) 23:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 16:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:City TV tower.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pp19948 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

"Presumed self" but listed at FFD, because concerns were expressed previously about assuming authorship. The extant uploads of this user all seem to use a different camera (based on the EXIF data). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Additonal -

File:Daltonganj station gate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pp19948 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Surat railway station.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pp19948 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete all - unclear authorship. The different models of camera make me suspect the uploader may not be the photographer. Kelly ^hi! 08:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Based on review, {{ PD-US-not renewed}} applies, whether or not the film was originally published with a copyright notice. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 19:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Megowan Monster.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Inkwell765 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

invalid PD reason Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

It's not an invalid PD reason. It's just that we don't have any evidence that it is true. I'm adding {{ where}}{{ fact}} to a PD statement in Tales of Frankenstein. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 19:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 19:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Blackburn Rovers FA-cup 1890-91.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Motor ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No author, so it's not possible to confirm it as a corporate work, In any case the link given to the FAQ making the claim appears to be be dead., and 70 (after publication) for corporate works is a new one to me. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Seems like it may have been a photo in a newspaper, given Lancashire Telegraph. Very likely falls under {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}} unless it wasn't published for decades. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Yeah. {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}} and {{ PD-UK}}. Ramaksoud2000 ^{( Talk to me)} 21:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: update license as per below. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 19:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Granvilleelliott3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Icairns ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Wrong license, based on the style, this is PD art surely? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Yeah. {{ PD-old}}. Ramaksoud2000 ^{( Talk to me)} 21:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: update license as per below ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 19:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Rogerelliott.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Icairns ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Wrong license, looks like an obvious PD-art, but whose the artist? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Artist unknown: [1] czar 04:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Artist long dead no matter who it is. Surely public domain. No need to find out the artist. Ramaksoud2000 ^{( Talk to me)} 21:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Independent Television Service logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dpr1984 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probably PD-Logo, therefore would need to have the licence changed and the file moved to Commons. AntiCompositeNumber ( Leave a message) 01:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Licensing changed to PD-logo and tagged image to be copied to Commons. Discussion can be closed as issue has been resolved. Salavat ( talk) 12:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Cotton1943 cropped.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Athrash ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence of permission. Obviously scanned from film, photographer is named as "C. Ray", but the uploader gives no evidence they are "C. Ray". Furthermore, the "Windfield Photographic Collection" noted in the template is associated with User:WayneRay, who has been banned and globally locked out from access to any Wikimedia projects. The uploader may be an undiscovered sockpuppet of Wayne Ray. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Wray toon2.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WayneRay ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image has no value to Wikipedia: a cartoon drawing of a Wikipedia editor who was banned and globally locked by the WMF back in March of this year due to his decidedly unwholsome activities. His article was already deleted and furthermore there's no evidence here of permission for releasing under the posted license. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete, no foreseeable use. Reh man 14:20, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 7#File:Mobile-City-Museum.jpg}}

File:Mobile-City-Museum.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ACES-wikiman ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Tornado aircraft above RAF Lossiemouth.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thx811 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unable to confirm claimed Open Government license. Kelly ^hi! 08:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Link appears to have broke. I've found the permalink at http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/archives/5036-Stock%20Images/Archive/RAF/45150/45150789.jpg which hopefully confirms that the OGL license applies Thx811 ( talk) 19:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

License confirmed, copied to Commons. Kelly ^hi! 14:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC) reply

File:Firelog.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zppix ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 10:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Per nom. Reh man 14:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 7#File:Rrussell.jpg}}

File:Rrussell.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BobCC ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.