The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Very low quality. Lots of streaking, black lines, poor contrast. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem to meet "non-free historic image". The store opened this year so anyone can easily get a free image of it. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not needed critically — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:24, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--while mentioned in the text, it is not necessary to reproduce this (and it is also half of the cover anyway.) — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--while mentioned in the text, it is not necessary to reproduce this. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--while mentioned in the text, it is not necessary to reproduce this (and it is also half of the cover anyway.) — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--while mentioned in the text, it is not necessary to reproduce this (and it is also half of the cover anyway.) — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject and substantially similar to the front cover. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject and substantially similar to the front cover. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject and substantially similar to the front cover. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject and substantially similar to the front cover. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject and substantially similar to the front cover. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
While one alternate cover is necessary critically, all six are not. I have not nominated the standard "woman in the corner" perspective. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
While one alternate cover is necessary critically, all six are not. I have not nominated the standard "woman in the corner" perspective. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
While one alternate cover is necessary critically, all six are not. I have not nominated the standard "woman in the corner" perspective. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
While one alternate cover is necessary critically, all six are not. I have not nominated the standard "woman in the corner" perspective. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
While one alternate cover is necessary critically, all six are not. I have not nominated the standard "woman in the corner" perspective. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Tagged {{ PD-old-100}}, but there is no artist information, so there is no evidence that the author died over 100 years ago as claimed. — Bkell ( talk) 06:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused image, apparently used to illustrate the uploader's original research. No clear encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 07:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Replaced by SVG: File:Smithfield Foods logo.svg. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 07:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free photograph of a Ferris Wheel in the 1980s, ostensibly used to show what it looked like compared to its present state (after some refurbishments in 1999). The changes appear to be so minor I can't actually see any significant difference between the two images; thus, NFCC#8 failure. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free (but very low-quality) photograph of an actor during his childhood. As a rule, we don't use non-free childhood photos simply to pretty up a person's biography section, unless the subject's appearance during childhood has some particular encyclopedic significance. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Superfluous to File:Deaf Havana Fools And Worthless Liars Album Art.jpg and not critically discussed. Differences easily replaced by text. Fails WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3a, WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:01, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Not discussed critically in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#3b, WP:NFCC#7 and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Not critically discussed. The article already has a different image. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC) reply