The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a hoax or possibly an attack or joke on someone. Eeekster ( talk) 05:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
No significance and unnecessary with DVD cover image File:Dance of the Wind, 1997, DVD.jpg present for infobox. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { T/ C} 05:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image. Even though it is claimed as a poster, from the original webpage it is stated that it is just a photograph from the set. A poster, screenshot or movie cover wouldbe apt as fair use in this page, but not this. Raziman T V ( talk) 13:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
One poster is already present in the infobox of the article. The second poster does not serve any particular purpose and is hence a redundant fair use image. Raziman T V ( talk) 13:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
One poster is already present in the infobox of the article. The second poster does not serve any particular purpose and is hence a redundant fair use image. Raziman T V ( talk) 13:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Dianna ( talk) 04:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Image fails WP:NFCC#8, as it's inclusion in the article doesn't significantly increase the readers understanding of the topic and it's omission isn't detrimental to that. Article also doesn't (and shouldn't) have critical commentary about this {{ non-free 2D art}}. Armbrust The Homonculus 13:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
unneeded image of taken apart computer parts -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
unneeded image of taken apart computer parts -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan poor quality photo of safety shoes. Image is taken at odd angle that illustrates no part of the shoe except a yellow dot. Not encyclopedic -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 21:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply