< January 19 | January 21 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, low quality. Uploaded with wrong licence as the film would have had a copyright notice. Cloudbound ( talk) 00:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, low resolution. Size and border suggest this is from an official source which may not have waived rights. Cloudbound ( talk) 00:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is so edited that it has no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 02:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
this image, while slightly larger by bytes, is not as clear an image as File:Ovits family (dwarfs) 300x178.jpg, which i just uploaded. I should have replaced the older with the newer. my mistake. I think we can only have one of them here as a non free fair use image. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality, not entirely clear if the photographer is a US Govt. employee or not. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned diagram, no description. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no description. Might be a language sample (if so I don't recognize the language, but there are Unicodes for most languages). Sven Manguard Wha? 06:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, appears to be for self-promotional purposes. This and one other upload are user's only active edits. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, appears to be for self-promotional purposes. This and one other upload are user's only active edits. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, poorly identified. Possibly userphoto, but user has been gone since 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, banner is probably copyrighted, sepia is unnecessary, no apparent encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free promotional image from a TV programme. Currently used in three articles but has (rudimentary) FUR only for one. Redundant to another, similar image that's already present in that article too. Very weak FUR. Fails NFCC#8 in all its uses, and NFCC#3 in the main article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid copyright template. This is a derivative work and the copyright should reflect the copyright of the medal. Sreejith K ( talk) 11:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Replaced in purpose by File:Calibri sample.svg. Cloudbound ( talk) 12:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The only purpose of this image seems to have been vandalism in the article Reigate School: [1]. I'm also questioning whether it is really a free image. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Replaced in purpose by File:Transport sample.png. Cloudbound ( talk) 17:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 17:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned product cover image. Kelly hi! 18:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Limited foreseeable use and questionable copyright. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unclear copyright status. Does not appear to be own work of the uploader. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unclear copyright status. Does not appear to be own work of the uploader. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Little encyclopedic value. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Limited foreseeable use. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by User:Terry Han but license states that User:E Masters is the creator (that user does not excist). Uploader seems to be long gone. I suggest that we delete to be sure. MGA73 ( talk) 19:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Limited encyclopedic value compared with similar images. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused. Low resolution and limited foreseeable use. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Incorrect Photo - Minneapolis, not Austin 68.183.40.21 ( talk) 23:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply