The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
It says that it is disputed whether the image violates WP:NFCC or not. I think it is quite obvious that it violates WP:NFCC#1: the person is still alive. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
There is a statement saying that it is disputed whether this image is replaceable or not. I think that a generic photo of some people doing their military service is quite easy to replace. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Obviously invalid reason for claiming that the image isn't replaceable. You just need to use a plane, helicopter, hot air balloon or anything similar. Lots of people use those things. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The event is sufficiently described in the text and doesn't need an unfree photo. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I think the photo is needed, because it is the only time in the development of the game that Agent had been officialy shown to the public. And it wasnt shown by screenshots etc., but by a simple logo. Yes, I agree with you that "The event is sufficiently described in the text", but the text dosnt described how or by who the game was announced. Thats why it should not be deleted. Hope you can understand this. SideMaster ( talk), 1 March 2012 (UTC)
But that is the only time the game has been officialy shown to public, and has since been secretly in development. The game hasnt been shown to public, since E3 2009. And it wasnt a announcment with screenshots, much info, trailer etc. (like other games at E3), but simply by a logo. This kind of announcment is rare for a game at E3! -- SideMaster ( talk), 02 March 2012 (UTC)
Thats exactly why this games announcment at E3 is so rare from others! Now please let us stop the discussion and let the imagine live on Wikipedia!-- SideMaster ( talk), 02 March 2012 (UTC)
I dont understand why you have a problem with the imagine. It has been on Wikipedia nearly 1 months and no one have a problem with it. Why do you have a problem with this? Let it be on Wikipedia for gods sake!-- SideMaster ( talk), 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, so ignore this imagine!-- SideMaster ( talk), 3 March 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unfree photo of a calculator which is replaceable by a free photo of the same calculator. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free photo of a boot which is replaceable by a free photo of the same boot. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
It says that it is disputable whether this is replaceable or not. This is replaceable because anyone can take a photo of those guards when they are marching. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
I'd say that the item shown on the photo is below the threshold of originality. As such, it is replaceable by a free photo of the same item. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Replaceable by a free photo of the machine when it is switched off. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
united nations works are not in the public domain generally speaking, and posting on the internet does not make something public domain. this image could be replaced by a genuinely free image (living person). Calliopejen1 ( talk) 03:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
no reason given to be public domain - why is this image public domain? Calliopejen1 ( talk) 03:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Blurry orphaned image of a MTA train. Better images exist here. Sumanch ( talk) 08:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Blurry, orphaned image of a SEPTA train. Sumanch ( talk) 09:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Really blurry image of Menemen Station. I am sure someone can re-shoot it and upload. Sumanch ( talk) 09:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I tagged this as "replaceable fair use" and a different user tagged this as "disputed replaceability" with the reason "This image is the specific photo the living person/subject wishes to have used on his public Wikipedia profile." If the person wishes to have this one on Wikipedia, he should publish it under a free licence and not just under a "permission for Wikipedia" licence. As it is now, it is replaceable since he is still alive. Stefan2 ( talk) 09:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I tagged this as "replaceable fair use" and a different user tagged this as "disputed replaceability" with the reason "This image is the specific photo the living person/subject wishes to have used on his public Wikipedia profile." If the people on the photo wish to have this one on Wikipedia, they should publish it under a free licence and not just under a "permission for Wikipedia" licence. As it is now, it is replaceable since all of the people on the photo still are alive. Stefan2 ( talk) 09:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I tagged this as "replaceable fair use" and a different user tagged this as "disputed replaceability" with the reason "This image is the specific photo the living person/subject wishes to have used on his public Wikipedia profile." If the person wishes to have this one on Wikipedia, he should publish it under a free licence and not just under a "permission for Wikipedia" licence. As it is now, it is replaceable since he is still alive. Stefan2 ( talk) 09:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, without useful descrption Bulwersator ( talk) 15:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Low resolution copy of File:AUT Würflach COA.jpg Bulwersator ( talk) 15:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, without useful descrption Bulwersator ( talk) 15:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo without description Bulwersator ( talk) 15:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless duplicate of File:Union State.svg Bulwersator ( talk) 15:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 15:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Old, unused documentation of a bug Bulwersator ( talk) 15:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused personal image Bulwersator ( talk) 15:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless map Bulwersator ( talk) 15:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 15:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless duplicate of File:Weisser Wolf Berlin ca 1998.jpg Bulwersator ( talk) 15:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
replaced by File:Mitsubishi Motors.svg Bulwersator ( talk) 15:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
replaced by File:Volvo logo.svg, used only in sandbox Bulwersator ( talk) 15:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 15:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo, replaced by svg. Bulwersator ( talk) 15:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo (except sandbox), of unnotable company Bulwersator ( talk) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo, replaced by svg. Bulwersator ( talk) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 15:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo, replaced by svg. Bulwersator ( talk) 15:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 15:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo, replaced by svg based on another png. Bulwersator ( talk) 15:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Completely useless image Bulwersator ( talk) 16:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic Bulwersator ( talk) 16:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Lower quality than http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Allen_radiation_belt.png Bulwersator ( talk) 16:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, extremely low quality Bulwersator ( talk) 16:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 16:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality image Bulwersator ( talk) 16:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality, unused Bulwersator ( talk) 16:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned logo Bulwersator ( talk) 16:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 16:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, may be replaced with a text Bulwersator ( talk) 16:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused personal image Bulwersator ( talk) 16:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused personal photo Bulwersator ( talk) 16:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused file without description, therefore useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused file without description, therefore useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused file without description, therefore useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused file without description, therefore useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused (except sandbox), useless Bulwersator ( talk) 16:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, may be replaced with a text Bulwersator ( talk) 16:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused, lower quality duplicate of File:Vietnam Staff Service Medal Ribbon.png Bulwersator ( talk) 16:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Useless, unused unencyclopedic image Bulwersator ( talk) 17:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
image appears to be sourced to the subject of th photo itself - needs OTRS verification of permission Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, looks like it was grabbed from the web somewhere (web resolution) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, not really clear whether this is an exact reproduction of the painting, we already have File:Thomas Lawrence Pinkie.jpg which seems to be a better version Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 17:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 17:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 17:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, logo used in deleted article MyMajors Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, apparent copyvio (cropped version of an image that appears here) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio (seems to be a copyrighted figurine - was added to Ogre Kingdoms (Warhammer) at one point) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbi Miller-Moro) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbi Miller-Moro) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbi Miller-Moro) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbi Miller-Moro) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbi Miller-Moro) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low quality (out of focus), many better images available [1] Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no longer needed Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
claimed to be self-made, but it's a band promo photo and the uploader also uploaded another tiny-res promo photo from this band that was deletd Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused logo Bulwersator ( talk) 18:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
professional-looking, low-res headshot - implausible self-made claim (this is of Natalia Pelevine btw) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (appears to be original research, no source given) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
I marked this as replaceable fair use but a user added a disputed replaceability tag. The bottle appears to be below the threshold of originality so a free photo of a bottle can be created. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (looks like nonsense) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (looks like nonsense) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (looks like nonsense) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (looks like nonsense) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (looks like nonsense) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Tagged as "orphaned fair use" by User:Skier Dude earlier today but the uploader quickly removed the tag. Apart from being orphaned, it also seems to be replaceable fair use. It appears to be the coat of arms of a US Army organisation, so there is no need to use a copy which violates Commons:COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet". Stefan2 ( talk) 18:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Uploader claims fair use because of inability to locate a copy of this boot, yet he quotes a forum post where someone bought a pair of them in a shop in Whistler. Fair use is generally not allowed for photos of real people since you can visit the people and produce free replacements, and for the same reason, I don't see why a fair use photo of a boot still in existence would be allowed since you can visit a boot owner and produce a free replacement. Besides, the article does not mention any specific boot model, so it would seem that it would be replaceable by a photo of a different boot model. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The purpose is "To illustrate the unique construction of the Spademan ski binding, which is no longer produced." However, this could be replaced by free photos of the binding. There is a possibility that this ad might be {{ PD-US-no notice}}, though. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
From the image's talk page "This photograph has been the subject of a copyright complaint from the photographer, Leni Sinclair. This photo is not in the public domain, and was not uploaded by the copyright holder. 64.236.128.40 (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Debra Sanderson, Rights and Clearances, AOL Inc." Peacock ( talk) 21:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F2 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I only see a blank box ( also uploader gone, orphan file), corrupted svg? Ronhjones (Talk) 23:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC) reply