The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned local copy of Commons file. Kelly hi! 01:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep Skier Dude ( talk) 06:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Not sure why we need an image like this in the article on 9/11 conspiracy theories. One could say it makes the no-plane theory look kind of stupid for trying to find anything in such a grainy image or that it gives it a greater appearance of credibility than it deserves by expecting readers to do that. I think what I can say is that this picture pretty much only succeeds in confusing people who bother to notice that it is not just an image of the towers. Not sure why a theory so soundly rejected by most 9/11 conspiracy theorists and discussed only flippantly in mainstream media justifies a rather unhelpful grainy image like this being included in any article on 9/11 conspiracy theories. The Devil's Advocate ( talk) 01:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; The keep !votes have not demonstrated why the image complies with WP:NFCC, criteria #1 and #8 to be specific. Also, please note that there is no precedent for "[cutting] a bit of slack" for Creative Commons files licensed with NC/ND restrictions. Non-free is non-free. - FASTILY (TALK) 11:25, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image of an ongoing event Doo Dah Parade. Could be replaced with a free image - for instance, see this photoset on Flickr. Kelly hi! 03:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
"The 1979 Doo Dah Parade in Pasadena, California. The Synchronized Briefcase Drill Team, with 16 men & women in three-piece suits performing precision routines, such as "Present Attache´s" here."
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Presumably this building still exists (if not I will withdraw this nomination) even if no longer the police headquarters, and could be replaced with a free photo. Kelly hi! 03:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Greetings, the City of Cambridge was contacted by (CARIBDIGITA) who volunteers to help expand informational articles on Wikipedia. (CARIBDIGITA) contacted us to obtain formal permission to use a photo taken by me of the Cambridge Police Dept. You have our permission to use this photo as a reference for informational purposes related to the Cambridge Police Department. If it is possible to add this credit: Photo courtesy of the City of Cambridge, great. If not, that is still ok to use the photo that appears in the link below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Police_Department_(Massachusetts)
Ini Tomeu Public Information Officer City of Cambridge 795 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph. 617-349-4339 / Fax 617-349-4199 itomeu cambridgema.gov (end quote)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned population graph. Kelly hi! 03:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan, can't be moved to Commons. Kelly hi! 06:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned version of File:Hamilton Fish Brady Edited.jpg. Kelly hi! 07:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Unused user photo, I assume. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The article Brandon Michael Sorg was deleted as A1. Thus, the photo looks unnecessary. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is a near duplicate of Commons image: File:Questionmark copyright.svg. In the original upload description summary the uploader says this was a temporary upload. I believe that we do not need this anymore. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has no description, and therefore potential use is unknown. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality orphaned image has no encyclopedic value and is most likely a personal image -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned personal photo -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality, low resolution orphaned image has no good purpose -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image can be replaced by plain text -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image can be replaced by plain text -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned Image is supposed to be the Tactical Recognition Flash, but the true one is here: File:RIRISH TRF small.jpg -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image can be replaced by commons file: File:Royal Gibraltar Regiment TRF.gif -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image is better replaced by File:3trf.GIF -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality Orphaned image is so blurry that it has no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality orphaned image. Replaceable by multiple images on Pratt & Whitney R-985 Wasp Junior -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has no encyclopedic value. May be copyvio of [ http://www.discogs.com/image/R-941766-1175426782.jpeg this]. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image may be copyvio as it is a sticker sheet insert from an album. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality Orphaned image is easily replaced by better quality images -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 14:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality orphaned image has no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 15:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality personal image has no good use. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 15:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Low quality orphaned image has no use. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 15:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Excessive use of non-free images in the article Malaysian ringgit. Besides, the coin is already displayed in File:New Malaysian Currency Design.jpg which appear in the article's infobox. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:WetmoreMS01.jpg; deletion discussion should happen there Magog the Ogre ( talk) 21:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Appears to be lifted from net, no exif data, file size and the image appears to be professional in nature, initial image uploaded with this name by the same uploader was a collage of magazine scans from what appears to be a fan site, the uploader is also a dormant single use account with a previous history of unfree uploads.-- KTo288 ( talk) 23:53, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply