The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This is essentially a duplicate of File:US Army WWII MSGT.svg. Using the WWII rank insignia will not diminish the value of this article. On the other hand calling it Sgt Rock rank may violate copyright. Sumanch ( talk) 03:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This is essentially a duplicate of File:US Army WWII 1SGT.svg. Using the WWII rank insignia will not diminish the value of this article. Sumanch ( talk) 03:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The image does not list any source or reference it is based on. So if it is user created art then it violates OR. If it is not, violates copyright. See the actual subject - Battle of Walcheren Causeway. Sumanch ( talk) 04:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned publicity photo. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder FASTILY (TALK) 04:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 01:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Logo of some sort, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 04:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Appears to be an orphan, un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 07:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Appears to be an orphan, un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 07:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Appears to be an orphan, un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 07:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan, un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 07:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
orphan, un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 07:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphan, un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 09:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has no description to illustrate what graph is for. Without description, this image has no encyclopedic value Sumanch ( talk) 10:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has no description to illustrate what graph is for. Without description, this image has no encyclopedic value Sumanch ( talk) 10:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image has no description to illustrate what graph is for. Without description, this image has no encyclopedic value Sumanch ( talk) 10:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The article already has a different cover of the same book. It doesn't need several. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a software screenshot, however the software itself isn't identified, and therefore we have no way of knowing if the software, and therefore the file, is free or non-free. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto, original uploader last active November 2007 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned user photo and un-encyclopedic media file. Sumanch ( talk) 23:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply