< December 2 | December 4 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξ xplicit 00:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξ xplicit 00:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a title card; every title card is not mentioned explicitly in every episode article. This is no exception. If it were a stand-alone TV film, like Fab Five: The Texas Cheerleader Scandal, the title card would be acceptable. However, the topic is an episode, so this image must go right away. (This nomination is approved optionally by my mentor Begoon.) George Ho ( talk) 07:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
low quality - apparently a joke 88.98.174.106 ( talk) 14:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC) reply
No indication of the actual original source/copyright holder. No explanation of what this image illustrates which could not be illustrated with words alone. J Milburn ( talk) 23:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply