< October 21 | October 23 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned, last version replaceable with math template Skier Dude ( talk) 00:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 00:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
OR, LQ, no encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 00:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep
Magog the Ogre (
talk) 05:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)delete - based off the deleted contributions of the user in question, it's pretty obvoiusly not the same Sam Ewing.
Magog the Ogre (
talk) 21:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
orphaned .possible user pic, no target article given Skier Dude ( talk) 02:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned pic of user's pet, no other encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 02:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user's talk page header Skier Dude ( talk) 02:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Any reason this stuff can't simply be moved out to Commons? Ah, I see - it's orphaned and used nowhere. Even the creator doesn't want it anymore, else it would be used. I don't get the rationale for keeping...an absent user might be offended that we deleted something they didn't want?
Kelly
hi! 02:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user image - no foreseen encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 03:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 03:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned, can be replaced by table Skier Dude ( talk) 03:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 03:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned, no target article or encyc use supplied Skier Dude ( talk) 03:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned logo. Would otherwise move to Commons, but not entirely sure if it's encyclopedic (i.e. even worthwhile to move), as it is "based on" the Penn Central logo, which makes me think it's an original creation, which would make it unusable for anything and thus out of scope at Commons. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 04:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned. Lower resolution and overly processed duplicate of File:Golden Spike ceremony, Promontory, Utah, May 10, 1869.jpg on Commons. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 04:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user image - could be G7 given file revision history? Skier Dude ( talk) 05:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
This has no source and no authorship information. Public domain or not public domain, (which, without a source, author information, and/ore a date, isn't verifiable), this has to go. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
License dubious, likely produced by the World Bank, not created by this user or eligible for release by him. Uploader has a number of other copyvio uploads of this vein. Relisting from October 9th, where FfD failed to transclude properly. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user-made logo Skier Dude ( talk) 05:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned user image - no other encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 05:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned, replaceable by math template Skier Dude ( talk) 05:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
OR, LQ, no encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 05:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned barnstar - superseded with SVG Skier Dude ( talk) 05:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned wiki screenshot - no encyc use Skier Dude ( talk) 05:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned wiki barnstar Skier Dude ( talk) 05:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned logo - no encyc use except on business article Skier Dude ( talk) 05:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned template text/image Skier Dude ( talk) 05:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
LQ Mathewkochi ( talk) 06:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, Looks like handwritten design notes for a blog site, Without further information, encyclopaedia use looks minimal. (Re-nom as advised first listing did not appear for technical reasons.) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, obseleted by File:Teretonga Circuit track map.svg a vector version with the same information. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, obsoleted by a selection of vector versions giving the same or enhanced information. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, obseleted by File:2-2pulldown.svg Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, Equivalent content now rendered as inline math. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, low quality, no source, no description. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, no source, no description. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, twisted camera view (so not best quality), minimal description. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Anomie ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free image removed from article per WP:NFCC#8 and challenged. Removal rationale was, "Not nearly enough discussion to warrant multiple non-free images." The only relevant article text to support this article is, "The trains were partially articulated, however the observation cars were not articulated with the rest of the trainsets." It is not necessary to use a non-free image to understand that the observation car in the consist was not articulated like the rest of the cars. Thus this image needs to be deleted... SchuminWeb ( Talk) 19:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: no consensus Magog the Ogre ( talk) 05:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned user graph. Kelly hi! 19:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan, Obsoleted by Vector version. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan file, completely redundant to File:Hundred Years War family tree.svg. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan file, completely redundant to File:Hundred Years War family tree.svg. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan file. According to the image "© HapyHadys Fanclub" and no evidence of permission. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
File from an internet site without any evidence of permission. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:58, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphan media, incorrect version of File:Flow bench schematic.jpg. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Incorporates two fair use images in one frame. | help dןǝɥ | 22:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) reply
PNG image extracted from SVG; not useful. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 22:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC) reply