The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Active game. A free image could reasonably be taken of this, and thus fails NFCC #1. 68.54.4.162 ( talk) 00:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Active game. A free image could reasonably be taken of this, and thus fails NFCC #1 68.54.4.162 ( talk) 00:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Active game. A free image could reasonably be taken of this, and thus fails NFCC #1. 68.54.4.162 ( talk) 00:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This is an active game show. A free image could reasonably be taken of this, and thus fails NFCC #1. 68.54.4.162 ( talk) 00:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This is an active game show. A free image could reasonably be taken of this, and thus fails NFCC #1. 68.54.4.162 ( talk) 00:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This is an active game show. A free image could reasonably be taken of this, and thus fails NFCC #1. Any information about the colors is minimal and can be conveyed without an image. 68.54.4.162 ( talk) 00:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Licensing says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in Wikipedia articles". That's not acceptable. This dosen't add enough to the article to justify fair use either. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
No encyclopedic value. Created by an angry, presumably because their non-free image uploads kept getting deleted, but unusable in an article because it's fan art of a living person. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Under license it says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in wikipedia articles". This is not acceptable, so the file would have to be non-free. The image adds nothing to the article, and the article itself is up for deletion as blatant advertising. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Under license it says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in wikipedia articles". This is not acceptable, so the file would have to be non-free. The image adds nothing to the article, and the article itself is up for deletion as blatant advertising. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Under license it says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in wikipedia articles". This is not acceptable, so the file would have to be non-free. The image adds nothing to the article, and the article itself is up for deletion as blatant advertising. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Under license it says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in wikipedia articles". This is not acceptable, so the file would have to be non-free. The image adds nothing to the article, and the article itself is up for deletion as blatant advertising. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Under license it says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in wikipedia articles". This is not acceptable, so the file would have to be non-free. The image adds nothing to the article, and the article itself is up for deletion as blatant advertising. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Nyttend ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Under license it says "The copyright holder, ypoong, gave me permission to use this work only in wikipedia articles". This is not acceptable, so the file would have to be non-free. The image adds nothing to the article, and the article itself is up for deletion as blatant advertising. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, not very good quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, not terribly good quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, web-resolution, two of user's four uploads are confirmed copyvios Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, web-resolution, two of user's four uploads are confirmed copyvios Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
orphan, description of file says "Image Source: Historical Collection" and "Creator: Unknown" yet claims PD-USgov. Source seems to be this library, which says a city (not the federal govt) is the rightsholder. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, out of date Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, likely copyvio (probably from Red Baron II based on user contribs) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, likely copyvio (probably from Red Baron II based on user contribs) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, likely copyvio (probably from Red Baron II based on user contribs) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:Tetrahydrofolic acid.svg Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
orphan, contemporary sculpture, no freedom of panorama in kazakhstan Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
orphan, contemporary sculpture, no freedom of panorama in kazakhstan Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (or just low-quality? drawn on 3, 4) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( HACKSAW web series) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ( HACKSAW web series) Calliopejen1 ( talk) 19:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
orphan, no source given, i doubt this complex graphic was made from scratch Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Blatant violation of fair use doctrine, mirror of entire prospectus. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs • count) 21:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low quality, better as text than as as image Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low quality, better as text than as as image Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by File:Haettenschweiler font.svg Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, superseded by standard locator map Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value (may have something to do with pet therapy, but probably not best to assume without uploader explaining), user's only contributin Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, unclear that uploader is photographer, originally uploaded as PD-ineligible (which it isn't) before another user changed the license to PD-self, kind of questionable licensing all around Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 ( talk) 22:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails FUC1: A free image could be created by one with access to the image. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Orphaned image that makes contentious unsourced claims (Australia and Pakistan being glaring examples, as with the large swathe of "failed states" which bizarrely includes Bhutan). Fails as original research. See also File:Worlds Index.gif. Claret Ash 23:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply