The result of the discussion was: Moved to Commons under the same name. Reh man 11:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Unused, subject obscured by row of cars in front. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 00:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Guy just Died, NFR is invalid since a reasonable search could have ealiy found the White House PD Image I am uploading shortly. The Resident Anthropologist ( Talk / contribs) 03:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot. Apparently random scene, not the object of analytical commentary, doesn't help to understand the article in any tangible way. Purely decorative infobox use. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free screenshot of a bowling player rolling a ball. While the FUR argues this is a particularly noteworthy moment, the image itself reveals no additional concrete information about that moment than the text itself does – it just looks like a generic picture of a bowling player in a pose like any other. Therefore fails NFCC#8 – omission wouldn't detract from the information value of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary non-free image. It's a photograph of a notable man at an important event of his life and his country's history, nevertheless, seeing the image is not necessary for the understanding of the event it depicts. The article can do without it. Damiens.rf 18:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. What many of the "keep" !voters seem to be missing here is that the presence of the free CG illustration, regardless of whether one finds it to be a great image or not, is proof of concept that the image is replaceable. That means that any non-free image of the same concept fails WP:NFCC#1, and therefore is not permitted for use on Wikipedia. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 00:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Free image File:Hydrogen explosion Fukushima Unit 1 cg visualization.png has made image obsolete. Currently not used in any articles. 293.xx.xxx.xx ( talk) 20:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
*Keep For a historic event, a copyrighted image is just fine.--
RaptorHunter (
talk) 20:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)--
RaptorHunter (
talk)
20:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 00:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Decorative screenshot, fails WP:NFCC #8. The article barely even mentions the site itself - the screenshot is not being used for critical commentary, nor is it necessary to identify them. The logo would suffice. B ( talk) 22:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 00:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply