The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv ( talk) 19:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: No consensus, BUT listing as a deletable image because the fair use rationale lacks a title for the article that it applies to. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
Three objections:
The result of the discussion was: delete. NFCC makes it very clear that uses of non-free images such as this—especially when free alternatives exist or could be created—are not acceptable. — ξ xplicit 00:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC) reply