Wikipedia:files For Deletion 2010 August 19

< August 18	August 20 >

August 19

File:Jonathanabreu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Was not sure if this should be tagged for a speedy because of the PD license but it does say "This is me for my User page ONLY" which is very much akin to "For Wikipedia use only" which is not allowed. So feel free to speedy it if any6one else feels it should be. Also unused and It is (was) also a duplicate of File:Yourboi.jpg, which was updated on July 27, 2010. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 00:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I am sorry about that I didn't know, I'll change it. Next time you should notify me when your deleting stuff I have created. AJona1992 ( talk) 16:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Comment: User has removed the This is me for my User page ONLY disclaimer however it is still unused and still (was) a duplicate of File:Yourboi.jpg. Also re: Next time you should notify me when your deleting stuff I have created. - Sometimes TW has glitches and does not place a notification on the users page, this may have been one of those times. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 05:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NbaLive 10 Lebron screen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

WP:NFCC#8 - decorative image, unhelpful fair use rationale, image not even mentioned in article. Mosmof ( talk) 03:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I put it up over a year ago to show the graphics of the game. ¿Ice? ( talk) 03:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Right, but it doesn't seem to have any contextual significance in the article, which is a requirement for a non-free image. -- Mosmof ( talk) 00:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I can change that. How should I do it? -- Ice ( talk) 01:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Delete: "purpose of use" is inadequate considering there is no mention of the image in the prose, so there is no way it can increase the reader's understanding of the article and therefore fails WP:NFCC#8. ww2censor ( talk) 03:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Comment I made a mention of it in the article and change the pics caption. -- Ice ( talk) 04:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Why did this get deleted? The whole problem was it wasn't mentioned in the article and I changed that a couple days ago. -- Ice ( talk) 01:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tibetanschool.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-good-the-bad4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use, likely copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Play Pictorial - The Girl in the Taxi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept. Can't be moved to Commons and could be used in The Girl in the Taxi and elsewhere. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep; Not valid reason for deletion request. It has clearly better quality within available. Also there is no strict guideline about foreseeable use in such notable actress or stage production. -- Pefp ( talk) 10:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diana Pinto in 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use, highly likely copvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2010 SMH Main Building .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MGA73 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bastetonlecbench.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blue John Veins in the Blue John Cavern.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept. I found a use for it. Should be moved to Commons. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Fine. I thought it might be useful for the examples of the Blue John veins in the stone. mfx ^Q&A 18:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1Angel of Independence.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted exception for File:Palacio Nacional.jpg moved to Commons, OK, and File:4Aztec Calendar.jpg now on Commons, nominated for deletion there. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use, uploader has a long history of uploading files with questionable copyright status. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Delete all: This editor has uploaded several copyright violations for some of which I was able to find sources proving his licence claims were false. Based on his track record I have to assumed all the above files are also copyright violations even though I have been unable to find sources. ww2censor ( talk) 14:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Delete except this one File:Palacio Nacional.jpg. That one should just be reverted to prior version. Benz65 uploaded on top of an excisting image. -- MGA73 ( talk) 18:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Done - FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I moved it to Commons. -- MGA73 ( talk) 09:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bornova Railway.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep - I just found a use for it. ---- DanTD ( talk) 11:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brokebamboo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CAR LIFT.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, blurry, no foreseeable use, possible copvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cumene 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EXtension 2color logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned company logo, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ejder2A.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fluoranthene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fromnamaste.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:54, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garth fagan dance at wou 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garth fagan dancers with wou students.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gay Street.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George 1.1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George 3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Girls Aloud in Glasgow.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: local copy deleted, now on Commons as File:Girls Aloud in Glasgow.jpg. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use, possible copvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep - It can always be used in an article on Girls Aloud. ---- DanTD ( talk) 00:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons and delete from here. As long as the license pans out no reason to delete. We can also ask for an OTRS on it if there is any question about the uploader being the photographer. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 16:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply
- The commons tag already exists there, so there's no need for a second. You can ask for an OTRS if you'd like, but I'll upload the image today, unless thunderstorms force me to disconnect from the internet. ---- DanTD ( talk) 18:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply
  - UPDATE - I did it. ---- DanTD ( talk) 18:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Living Enrichment Center Goldfish Bowl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hansenpatio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons This looks like another image of the Living Enrichment Center that could be moved under said category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 00:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Good Luck Charlie logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, obsolete, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Index 14.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indian rupee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, can be represented by a unicode character. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JeffBaird.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned vanity shot, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use and Lol. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kiddierides.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use and lol FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecfellowshiphall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecentranceabandoned.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecfrontdoor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecgazebo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leclastservice2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecloadingdock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leclobby.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leclobbyramp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecmural.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Living Enrichment Center patio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecpond.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lecskybridge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LouisCamposandKids.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michigan Flag Proposal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mranonymous1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mranonymous3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Move to Commons Under Living Enrichment Center category. ---- DanTD ( talk) 02:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nationale wielrentrui van Nieuw Zeeland.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nutcracker ballet willamette ballet 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
What about the image is low quality? Move to commons. – xeno ^talk 12:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oblc 6-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Used in userspace, image from a government website. — ξ ^xplicit 18:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oblc 7-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Used in userspace, image from a government website. — ξ ^xplicit 18:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oblc 7-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Used in userspace, image from a government website. — ξ ^xplicit 18:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pinkinklogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned company logo, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PuertoMadero.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
What about the image is low quality? Move to commons. – xeno ^talk 12:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reagan,Siller,Baker.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Possible permissions issue or copyright violation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samuelson,Joan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Copied to Commons as File:Joan Samuelson.jpg. Something is awry with the thumbnail; I assume this is a problem with the MediaWiki software, because the original image seems fine. — Bkell ( talk) 05:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Terry's of York.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Speedy keep, bad faith nomination: there's no way that this is low quality. Definitely within scope at Commons. Nyttend ( talk) 02:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC) reply

What's more, I've found a use for it. Fastily, why don't you look in the contribution histories of uploaders? Images are often uploaded just before being added to an article. Nyttend ( talk) 02:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC) reply

With all due respect, don't be so quick to judge. It's obvious you don't agree with me but that's no justification for personal attacks, declaring "bad faith nominations" when I'm going by careful and impartial judgment at Category:Orphan images. - FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Keep until it is copied to Commons, no reason to delete just because it is not currently used. Another use for it would be on the York page. Keith D ( talk) 10:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tonya harding mac reception.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tonya harding mac reception2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vietnam Parachutist badge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Possible permissions issue or copyright violation FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
- Is there a replacement available? If not, I'd prefer not to remove it until we can get one. ---- DanTD ( talk) 18:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Badnarik card.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Copyright image with .o clear reason its inclusion in the article. Reference is not made to this card in the article and the accompanying text where its placed has no relevance. Image seems largely decorative in effect Solid State Survivor ( talk) 07:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1957A US DollarBill.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphan, public domain image Cnilep ( talk) 16:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
A duplicate (in concept) of File:SilverCertificate1Dollar.jpg 72.244.206.93 ( talk) 18:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FSHS Seal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Low Quality/Distorted Cmcginni ( talk) 16:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:7layer.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MGA73 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Orphaned. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 18:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bain Capital for Wiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 18:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American girl dolls logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced with a png version of the file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Detroitfreepress091201.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Already have one non-free image for Detroit Free Press for identification purposes. Not sure what this second one is for. howcheng { chat} 19:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeeGees68.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. There is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect. The claimed purpose of this image is to illustrate the groups as a quintet but the text clearly establishes this fact. Solid State Survivor ( talk) 19:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep: The image is not how most people perceive the group so it can be important in the scope of the article...however, this needs a caption on the image and the article needs to discuss it. Part of the problem right now is that the article does not seem to mention a five member band...and that information needs to be placed in the article for this image to meet all 10 of the Wikipedia Policy on Non-Free content. In other words the image page states this is being used to illustrate the group as a quintet. The name of the image implies it was taken in 1968 and currently the section this image is being used in, Late 1960s – first international fame, does not seem to mention a five member line up. There is a line about Following the success of Bee Gees 1st, the band (which now consisted of Barry on rhythm guitar, Maurice on bass, Vince Melouney on lead guitar and Colin Petersen on drums), began work on the act's second album which seems to indicate a four member band. After that, starting with in early 1968..., the reader is provided with Following the tour and TV special to promote the album, Vince Melouney left the group.... After that the article moves to 1969. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 14:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey Soundvisions one, thanks for your thoughtfull input on this discussion. A free-use rationale pertains only to a single image in-and-of-itself and cannot be spread over the context of what other images are available on the page. So in this instance if we said that a certain image establishes scope by depicting the group in a very different fashion from other available pictures - it does not really do so, rather it only establishes the groups appearance at that given moment of time which begs the question "what is significant about their visual appearance at that given moment?". If there were something integral about the groups visual appearence in a specific photo which was discussed to some length in the text of the article then I could see how a copyrighted image could add to the content - however the article does not make any important mentions of visual style in that time and if the topic is not notable enough for discussion in the text I cant an image as justifiable. Solid State Survivor ( talk) 04:24, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Reply/Comment: What you said is basically what I said - and I raised that issue because perhaps it was omitted form the article by accident. Most people think of the group as three brothers, not an actual band. This image does illustrate the fact they were, at one time, a band - but, as I said, and you re-enforced, currently there is no text that relates directly to this image and that is needed. Per the free image I did consider that however they are not the same even if they are from the same time period. The non-free image actually shows a five member band in a posed shot. The other, the free image, features three members - the same three members we always see even in later images - in a live setting. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 16:51, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeeGees75Tour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. here is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect. Solid State Survivor ( talk) 19:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete: As this is a live image I might be in favor of keeping it if it were being used to somehow illustrate an important concert but I didn't see anything in the text, or the image, that indicates it is. The caption simply says Performing in 1975 while the FUR says it is in the article To illustrate the Bee Gees from that period.. Again, as with the other images, this sort of falls into the "middle" and if is just used to show the brothers playing live we have a free image that shows that. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 14:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeeGees77.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. here is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect. Solid State Survivor ( talk) 19:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete: I agree that the article now contains a few too many non-free images. I would say File:BeeGees68.jpg could be used to show their early look and File:BeeGees83.jpg to show their later look - and when I say "look" I mean a combination of things - from the bands members to young vs old. This is sort of a "middle" image in the scope of the images in question. I also wanted to point out that there are articles on Saturday Night Fever: The Original Movie Sound Track and Spirits Having Flown that both contain the groups image from this period on their covers. In other words if one really wanted to see what the group looked like at this time they could view File:BeeGeesSpiritsHavingFlown.jpg and File:TheBeeGeesSaturdayNightFeveralbumcover.jpg that are in their respective articles. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 14:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I say keep '68 and '77. Delete the rest. The two complement a good crash course in Bee Gees history. If you can find a recent picture of the group performing, you might consider adding that as well, just to keep up-to-date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.74.214 ( talk) 23:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeeGees83.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

It is unnecessary to show the band at every given point in their career. here is already an acceptable free use image of the group on the page, and other free use images exist on the internet; considering this we should not violate copyright in order to add additional images at different times - unless a specific image illustrates a distinct visual feature discussed in the text. Judging by then even distribution of images throughout the article the images seem more decorative than informative in effect. Solid State Survivor ( talk) 19:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Weak Keep: When I think of the Bee gees i think of the three brothers - young or old. We have the free image that shows them young, if we keep File:BeeGees68.jpg we have an early band shot, so one can make an educated guess that the young men grew "old" (or at least "older") by 1983. The caption for this images states he Bee Gees in 1983 during the disco backlash that lasted for most of the '80s, yes File:BeeGees77.jpg, visually, comes off as far more "disco" and perhaps that could be the point of this image from 1983. The image is not the disco era image they had but an older, more mature image. If the main article text can be used to re-enforce this image in relation to that I might have a stronger "keep" view. For example the line in the article contained in the last section of the SNF section: By the end of 1979, disco was rapidly declining in popularity, and the backlash against disco put the Bee Gees' American career in a tailspin. is a perfect lead in to the image and the "1980s and 1990s" section that begins In 1981, the Bee Gees released the album Living Eyes, but with the disco backlash still running strong, the album failed to make the US top 40. However currently it is not set up that way. Also I said "weak keep" because one can simply look at the article for their 1981 Living Eyes album which contain the cover: File:Album_Living_Eyes.jpg, which has an image of all three members on it form the same time period. Soundvisions1 ( talk) 14:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks again Soundvisions for your input. I believe the comments I made concerning the 68 image dealing with use of images in establishing scope apply here as well. However, I would add that if additional referenced text could be added to the article to discuss a change in their image in the disco-backlash of this time period a picture here could be justifiable and enhance reader understanding of the topic. Solid State Survivor ( talk) 04:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Academyreddawn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Marasmusine ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I have G7'nd this and File:Academyifitmoves.jpg; hadn't noticed they had been replaced. Thanks. Marasmusine ( talk) 19:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Academyifitmoves.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Marasmusine ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AeraEnergyLLC Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alloy Ventures Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:14march.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BITE TV.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beachhead G.I. Joe.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 19:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Calgon water softener logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file. Hugahoody ( talk) 19:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brink TV series logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hawthorne1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HappyJoes.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Allgrownuplogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aereonlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2010 World Lacrosse Championship logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HF-New-Logo-2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 20:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Then mark this one as orphaned fair use, and away it goes. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply
By the way, for the record: I didn't upload this image. I reverted it to an earlier, reduced size version to comply with our fair use requirements. The original uploader can be seen from the image's edit history. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 15:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Htt folder.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 21:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American-securities-logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 21:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angelo-gordon-logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced by a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 21:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arlington-capital-logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Replaced with a png version of the same file Hugahoody ( talk) 21:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.