The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:6th wing1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gvsfans ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Hyelverton.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RossLoudon ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• image is too small to be of much use. Now replaced by much bigger version on Commons : File:Hastings Yelverton Vanity Fair 23 June 1877.jpg Rcbutcher ( talk) 07:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Quicktimex.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Aanhorn ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• This image fails to comply with Wikipedia Non-Free Content Criterion 3a: Minimal usage (“multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information”) as it is using multiple items of non-free content (i.e. (1)QuickTime Player and (2) Pixar's Up) when only one (QuickTime Player) is sufficient. This image can reasonably be replaced with a screenshot of QuickTime Player that is showing a free video from Wikimedia Commons. Fleet Command ( talk) Fleet Command ( talk) 09:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Fleet Command ( talk) 09:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delete - per nom. cmadler ( talk) 19:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and tag as {{ PD-text}}. howcheng { chat} 05:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Carlito's Way Score Cover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by VodkaJazz ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Not at all clear why this cover is in any way significant. Does not appear to pass our non-free content criteria. J Milburn ( talk) 10:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The rationale was uploaded to the image's page. This is the same rationale used for all original score cover images when used in the motion picture's and soundtrack's articles. I do not understand what the problem is... which nevertheless, would be with the policy in place for all such images not this particular image. Furthermore, considering the fact that you flagged this image yesterday and the updated rationale was uploaded today, I fail to understand why you decided to fast track its deletion without even dropping me a courtesy note and discussing it. _└  ^VodkaJazz /  _talk ^┐ 12:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

• Keep - The fair use rationale might be improved by using a template (see Category:Non-free use rationale templates), but I think the rationale given is adequate and this is almost certainly a suitable use. It is commonly accepted that a suitably small cover image can be used in an article about an album. In this case the album doesn't have a stand-alone article but is included as a section within the movie's article, and so it is appropriate to use the album cover in that section, as has been done here. cmadler ( talk) 17:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep and tag {{ PD-ineligible}}. The cover contains nothing other than text in a font. Stifle ( talk) 08:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Doesn't necessarily meet all WP:NFCC (esp. 1, 8). Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Directional michigan 50.png ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Paulmcdonald ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Fails WP:NFCC criteria 1, 5, and 8. In particular, #1: Contrary to the FUR, this is not a logo used by any organization to identify itself, it is a graphic designed by ESPN to indicate a grouping of three schools. #8: This graphic does not aid understanding of the topic. A better graphic for this topic might be an outline of Michigan with markers at the locations of Eastern, Central, and Western; that would help with an understanding of the geographical positioning of the schools. cmadler ( talk) 13:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep for about a hundred reasons, but after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directional Michigan (2nd nomination) I'll hang my hat on this simply being disruptive. But since I should address the two remaining issues: #1 I would continue with "...and is therefore very useful" and #8 of course it aids in the understanding of the topic--Michigan with a compass: "Directional Michigan" -- failure to "blank out" an article to get it deleted is not a reason to delete an image in an attempt to make a forthcoming third deletion attempt more successful. Wikipedia is not about winning.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 17:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

• I'm sorry if you perceive this as disruptive. I think the article should have been deleted, but I have not and will not "blank out" an article, and I haven't observed anyone else blanking out this article either. The question of whether this image is used appropriately is a separate question from the article itself. cmadler ( talk) 17:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

• If it's created by ESPN, it's not given the same kind of license we give to use of FU logos of organizations for identification purposes. So without that, it does fail NFCC.8 as it is unnecessary to understand the subject. ÷ seresin 17:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:PC030023.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image. Sottolacqua ( talk) 18:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:HiloPriceIsRight.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image from deleted article. Sottolacqua ( talk) 18:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Smackdownset.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image. Sottolacqua ( talk) 18:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:P4010072.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image Sottolacqua ( talk) 18:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Hamo thornycroft.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by GraemeLeggett ( notify | contribs | uploads).

• unused & inferior duplicate of File:Hamo thornycroft00.jpg on Commons Rcbutcher ( talk) 20:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.