Support – there is a white vertical streak under the base of the bottle, it can be removed. A similar one in the original (bottom right corner) was removed. On a sidenote, when restoring, it's best to start from the original tiff, rather than a jpeg.
Bammesk (
talk) 02:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
While one has to be careful people don't stop looking African-American, this does feel like it's rather low contrast, nothing lighter than a dull grey. Maybe play with the white and midpoints of the levels a little? Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.9% of all
FPs. 17:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Not mine, I fear. But trying some things, it honestly looks like setting the white point pretty near the brightest point in the image will largely fix this. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.9% of all
FPs. 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose I like old shots, but still isnt as it could be, unsharp, like fuzzed. --
Petar Milošević (
talk) 17:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose – A good nomination, but the haziness and the unsharp details is commendable. Yes, it resonates with the time period and the style of the photo, but we have had older and sharper FPs. Also, per Adam's comment on contrast and white balance. Another point, negligible yet important IMO, is the angle of the subject. It kinda reduces the EV for a lead image of a GA.
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply