Nominate and support. - I think that this picture in better quality can be a really great picture.
Baseracer 01:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Doesn't meet size requirements per
Wikipedia:What is a featured picture?, is way too grainy, and has blown highlights. I agree with the nominator, a better picture would get more support, but this version just doesn't cut it. --Tewy 02:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Agree with Tewy, very impressive scene, very underwhelming quality capture.
Diliff |
(Talk)(Contribs) 13:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Tewy. Also, some people are not into doctored photos. There is a link to the original where you can see dust has been removed (good) and clouds painted in the top right corner (possibly bad). I personally don't care that much about that aspect, but I know some voters distain this sort of thing so I am mentioning it.--
Andrew c 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose per all above. --
Bridgecross 18:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose 636 pixels across, 1000 minimum is the requirement -
Adrian Pingstone 20:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Horrible quality, and much too small. Please read
WP:WIAFP. NauticaShades 21:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose. As per above. -
jlao04 02:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply