Comment: Great work on getting hold of bigger copies. However, we aren't in the habit of promoting .tif files- we'd need to see them converted to jpg.
J Milburn (
talk) 00:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Files converted. Also some improvement of rotation and crop done on the images. (Since no one had voted, just changed the original.)
TCO (
reviews needed) 03:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)reply
OTRS note: Pursuant to
VRTS ticket #
2011070810013625 the three images are confirmed as public domain. — Cirt (
talk) 02:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Thanks, uber-vet. I feel that the caption for the first image needs a little skinnying somehow.
TCO (
reviews needed) 23:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Nice, I suppose there are no colour ones?, 1945 b/w then. Regards,
SunCreator(
talk) 18:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Ticks all the boxes, nice to have a sequence of images, solid ev. What's the plan for this as a FP, each image separately or combined as one file? Fallschirmjäger✉ 21:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)reply
It's the assembly. I don't think they are as compelling as individual shots. To me, its the implicit process flow diagram, where you can really see. them. make. uranium!
They'll be promoted as a set. They'll all go in the gallery, but only one of them will hit the main page.
J Milburn (
talk) 21:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)reply
That's a great idea, 'preciate! Would be curious which of the three you would choose?
P.s. I thought about doing some table or collage or even having block arrow and plus sign, but the default gallery (which I usually hate) works pretty decent here. Am re-using same layout method in the "Occurence" section of
Fluorine".
TCO (
reviews needed) 00:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)reply