Original - A 1909 panorama of Tulsa, the second-largest city in the state of Oklahoma and 45th-largest in the United States.Edit1 - 2 major vertical stitch gaps 1/4 and 1/2 way from left closed up and three less obvious seams smoothed over by
Mfield.
Reason
This is a wonderful photo that shows the amount of growth that the city of
Tulsa, Oklahoma went through only two years after Oklahoma became a state. It is very fine quality with high resolution and illustrates the article, History of Tulsa, Oklahoma very well.
Reluctant Oppose - wonderful scene, and it's great to see a panorama that's this old, but there's two major vertical stitching errors - the first roughly x=784 pixels from left, and the second at x=3122. Oppose until these are corrected.See below. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:29, 26 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit1 - I closed up the gap and added Edit1. I will have a further examination and see if there's anything more to fix/repair and if so I will replace.
Mfield (
talk) 19:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Check the spots Vanderdecken mentioned. There are a few other extremely minor stitching problems too (eg. 1257px from left on edit 1), but they're bordering on imperceptible.
Thegreenj 20:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Fixed the other major stitch error too, replaced Edit 1 with new version.
Mfield (
talk) 20:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Fixed another three, replaced it again. I am pretty certain I have got them all now.
Mfield (
talk) 23:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Fixed, change vote to Strong Support edit 1. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 07:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1 No reason not to support this now.
Thegreenj 00:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1. Sweet.--
ragesoss (
talk) 01:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1. The image is quite encyclopedic, and
Mfield did a good job fixing the errors. NauticaShades 02:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1 Per above.--
Fireaxe888 (
talk) 09:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment moved - it split Nautica's sig in half. —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment Am I crazy or does there still seem to be a tiny error at approximately x=3,8000 (guess) at the very bottom. Not a huge deal, I suppose, but it's still there.
Crassic! (
talk) 17:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Now you see it, now you don't?
Mfield (
talk) 17:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1 nice found, will do much good for the content illustration.
M.K. (
talk) 16:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1 A good historic image. This pic was taken 99 years ago. My grandmother was born in 1909. And she is still living.(^^)/
Laitche (
talk) 21:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1. High encyclopedic value. -
Darwinek (
talk) 16:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Edit 1 Great panorama for this time. SpencerT♦C 01:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Promoted Image:Tulsa Panorama 1909 edit1.jpgMER-C 07:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)reply