Oppose - Lacks the "wow" factor I expect in a good movie poster. Scan is technically good, but the photos and presentation not on par with the previous posters. --
Janke |
Talk 12:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
It's not a poster. It's a flyer, made to distribute quickly and cheaply. As for "wow"... the differences between Commons' and En-Wiki's FP processes have been discussed to death. Doubt more discussion would do any good here. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 13:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Well, if you allow me to rephrase, I'd say that IMO, it's not up to En-Wiki's FP criteria #3. --
Janke |
Talk 16:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Support – high quality, high EV.
sst✈(top/bottom) 14:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment, leaning support: There's a lot of dirt spots, particularly the woman on the right has a lot of brown dots and white fibres on her, the man next to her less so but still a few smaller ones. Those seem like they should be cleaned. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 16:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Support I see where the quality of the content is considered quite poor, but the quality of the scan and the EV is quite high, thus my support.
Mattximus (
talk) 01:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Support –
Jobas (
talk) 14:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)reply