Robert Clotworthy (permission request and upload by
User:Deskana)
Support as nominator --
Julia\
talk 19:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I don't like all that use of screen realestate for the image. Too much shirt not enough face plus he is very slanted. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
TechFilmer (
talk •
contribs) 19:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose per TechFilmer. Unfortunate daylight-colored glare on glasses, which is probably (carefully) removable. And I could be wrong, but it seems his nose is in focus but his eyes aren't. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Alt added: Cropped (and slightly rotated anticlockwise). Really don't think the glasses glare detracts from the portrait.
Julia\
talk 20:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)reply
I do, sorry (regarding glare). I also think there should be slightly more headroom, again per TechFilmer's comments. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Support I don't believe in rigid portraits and quite like the composition on this one. The headroom can be increased in PS if it's a very big deal --
Muhammad(talk) 03:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose original but support alternative version. The framing seems off to me in the original one, a portrait should have a larger portion taken up by the head. The alternative version looks good to me. Cabe6403(
Talk•
Sign) 08:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose both I think the flat lighting and brightness washes it out too much, far to flat of lighting, makes it less interesting then it could of been. — raekyt 14:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Oppose The technical quality is quite good but I can't bring myself to support due to the flat lighting and aforementioned composition issues. I think a picture like
this picture would be better at illustrating his profession as a voice actor (although that linked image is CC-BY-NC-SA which is not allowed here).
dllu(t,
c) 08:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)reply