Add your reasons for nominating it here;
say what article it appears in, and who created the image.
Nominate and support. -
Taida 23:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment: I've taken the liberty to remove the timestamp from the image.--
Eloquence* 01:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment not used anywhere. -
Ravedave 02:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The tentiacles are cut off. Jellyfish are best photographed against black, it brings out more detail and makes them look more vibrant. Also, I don't like the lighting. --
Pharaoh Hound 16:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment maybe with some creative cropping the cut off tentacles would be less of a problem? It's bad having so much space above and below, but then cutting off to the sides though. Agree about the blue - maybe some touching up could make that less offensive, but still - don't think it's going to get there.
Stevage 19:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose I'd want to see more of the tentacles (how far do they stretch?) - -
Adrian Pingstone 20:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Not in an article. --
Enano275 05:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not too keen on the cropping/bg either. Also the focus is a bit off and there are white dots everywhere. --
Fir0002www 11:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. JPEG compression artifacts and lots of speckels. Perhaps this was a scanned image? Plus the composition is lacking. howcheng {
chat} 19:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I really don't like the background, and there are a fair number of artefacts. The white dots aren't that pretty either. Also, doesn't appear to be used in any articles.
GeeJo(t)⁄(c) • 11:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)reply