The beauty of the Hindu goddess speaks for itself.
User:DaGizza
Oppose the resolution is too low.
This link isBroken 04:27, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Far too small.
ed g2s •
talk 10:36, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Unknown copyright status.
Ericd 20:28, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, no copyright info.
Mgm|
(talk) 09:51, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, So low res that it hardly worth having it on wiki at all. Leaves a person frustrated, like the donkey and the carrot, a treasure chest without a key, a thumbnail you can't expand. --
Fir0002 04:43, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Very small. --
SilversmithHewwo 18:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, too small.
Phoenix2 19:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose unless a larger version is acquired (I'm looking for one right now, with little luck). As an artwork, this scale is inexcusable. When I see a photo thumbnail on Wikipedia, *especially* of an artwork, I fully expect to click through to an UBER HI-RES version. If you look at
this version of the picture I just found, it seems that our copy has been somehow modified from the original, much like the "enhanced" Last Suppers floating around the web; if we're going to proudly show off an artwork we need to have The Real Thing(TM) and not some rebuilt interpretation. In closing, if this was screen-filling I would say it was beautiful and fully support it as a featured picture, but the way it is it's worthless to us.--ooops, formatting! I found and added the source of the image, not that that helps much...
Master Thief GarrettTalk 03:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)