- Reason
- shows a well-defined storm in the Gulf of Mexico
- Articles this image appears in
- Hurricane Rita
- Creator
- NASA
- Support as nominator *****Elena85****** User:Elena85/2008cyclone 22:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Again?! You just nominated this two weeks ago and it didn't get promoted. Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Rita 2005-09-21 1610Z.jpg -- Dschwen 23:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- A few editors suggested posting one at a time. -- Uncle Bungle ( talk) 02:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support This is what a hurricane picture ought to look like, IMO. Centered, crisp, and the visible landmass gives some impression of the storms immense scale. A major hurricane in a particularly harsh season. -- Uncle Bungle ( talk) 02:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Question What are the red boxes visible at full resolution? -- Uncle Bungle ( talk) 02:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I suspect they're "thermal anomalies" detected by the MODIS Rapid Response System - inconsistencies in the infrared and thermal infrared bands. There's a bit more info here. Time3000 ( talk) 13:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Support Shows a well defined storm that compares to the Gulf of Mexico Moonlight567 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joan97 ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC). Might as well just strike this vote as Elena and Joan seem to be the same person. -- Dschwen 15:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)- Comment I don't understand the motivation for someone to resort to sock puppetry for something as uncontroversial as an FP for a hurricane. Recommend suspend and report as sock puppet. Comments? -- Uncle Bungle ( talk) 03:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 08:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)