Bones
- Creator: LadyofHats
- Reason: Another collection of high quality, high enc value SVG of LadyofHats. I removed the less "enc" ones.
-
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -
13 -
14
.svg)
- Support -- Arad 22:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Well, that's a lot of good images. However, I'm afraid that they will have to be nominated separately. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 23:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I remember that we already had a FP set before. -- Arad 23:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- True, but these are used in different articles. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 23:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support all EXEPT #2 #2 is on the simple side to be featured, I think. - Fcb981 23:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I think we need to define what a "set" of featured pictures is. I don't think it applies in this case though since the only commonality is the creator. Oppose procedurally therefore, I'd be up for supporting individual images though. LadyofHats needs more barnstars though. ~ trialsanderrors 00:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose 6, 10, 11, 12: The drawings are great, but following the labels is like watching a tennis match (though at least they're not just numbers). Most of these drawings could use image maps too. I made one for number three just a week ago (after moving the labels slightly). I'm also not sure about having a group of images going through FPC together and oppose procedurally as per Trialsanderrors. — Pengo 00:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I started a discussion on featured sets at WT:FPC. ~ trialsanderrors 00:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as set There is some duplication among these, at least visually, and not all are FP quality, IMO. This is quite different from the Mandelbrot FP, where the images formed an unbroken sequence. -- Janke | Talk 13:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as set per above gren グレン 08:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as set Tomer T 19:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted without prejudice. Feel free to renominate if and when featured picture sets become a reality, or individually. MER-C 08:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
