Support as nominator – — Cirt (
talk) 16:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)reply
SupportComment: This image is used at
Horse#Sleep_patterns on-wiki. It was photoshopped from the original,
here. I like the image, but am not familiar enough with the FP criteria to know if the photoshopping was OK. If the photoshopping is OK, then I support.
Montanabw(talk) 21:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Like I said, if the photoshopping is OK per FP criteria here on WP, then I'm OK with it.
Montanabw(talk) 21:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Montanabw:I double-checked it for you: per
WP:WIAFP criteria eight (8), points one and two, it meets the criteria. :) — Cirt (
talk) 21:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Changed vote to support. Upon review of original image, the image was cloned to remove a partial view of another horse standing in the background that basically made the standing animal look as if it had six legs. Sort of the equivalent of erasing a telephone pole growing out of someone's head. It was made a featured image at Commons about 7-8 years ago, surprised it wasn't brought here until now.
Montanabw(talk) 22:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I'm sorry, the file size does not meet the 1500x1500
minimum requirement and lacks some degree of fine detail. Removing a partially obscured
third horsecould be considered (by some) as digital manipulation.-
Godot13 (
talk) 21:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Godot. --
Tremonist (
talk) 13:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose IMO the editing is fine, but it is too small for FP here.
Yann (
talk) 22:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose Agree with Godot. I want to like and support this photo, but just can't.
Fredlyfish4 (
talk) 02:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)reply