Question Have one without a big hair on the bottle?
Makeemlighter (
talk) 03:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Cloned out, thanks for spotting them.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 03:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose Quality is good, but I don't see the EV of such a picture. Does
Lemonade really need to be illustrated? --
Muhammad(talk) 04:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Support Apparently there are several different varieties of lemonade that vary by geographic region. Good demonstration of the way pulp behaves in homemade lemonade.
DurovaCharge! 05:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment I think something went wrong with the upload because I'm still seeing the hair in the neck of the bottle --
Fir0002 07:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
You might have to purge the cache or refresh a few times to get it to go
Noodle snacks (
talk) 08:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Support Sure, why not? It's very good quality and well-done.
Shoemaker's Holiday (
talk) 12:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose sorry but I just don't think this is the best possible way to depict lemonade. I considered myself to be pretty familiar with lemonade but wasn't 100% sure what the contents of the bottle was just by looking at the picture, I think this could be made clearer.
Guest9999 (
talk) 14:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Yeah, but then it wouldn't be cloudy lemonade would it :P. The image could also find EV in
translucency (since its backlit).
Noodle snacks (
talk) 01:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Muhammad. I don't see how this picture is extraordinary from its technical aspect either. I just see a very blurry bottle. --
mcshadyplTC 21:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak support Of the three this is the one which comes closest to providing a pleasing support shadow. Pretty good EV IMO --
Fir0002 08:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak support It's interesting, but the top of the bottle is a bit difficult to differentiate from the background. SpencerT♦C 22:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)reply
No consensus MER-C 02:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply