We already had a
FP of camouflage a year ago or so, but I stumbled upon this one by
Adrian Pingstone. It does have some problems with it, like blurriness, but I think it'd make a nice image if it got touched up a bit.
Nominate and support. -
JPM | 19:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment, doesn't look too bad, though I don't think nominations shouuld be made with the intention of someone touching them up.
Phoenix2 20:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Well, I didn't really think it was at FP quality the way it was, so I wanted to make it clear that I think someone should touch it up. -
JPM | 22:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)reply
In that case, oppose, messy in too many ways.
Phoenix2 00:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose A bit too messy, and what appears to be an endemic problem: tail end cut off, lessening the encyclopedic value... --
Janke |
Talk 21:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. It's an OK picture, not FP quality, though. Too messy is right. --
J@red[T]/[+] 16:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose The background has to be messy or how would the astonishing camouflage be demonstrated? But I don't think it's a suitable FPC candidate (I took it!) -
Adrian Pingstone 16:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Too messy and confusing. AlvinruneTALK 22:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Very messy. Hard to figure out what you are looking at.
Canuck89 08:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)reply