Weak support. I wish it was bigger, but I do think it is an aesthetically pleasing image of an encyclopedic subject. JHMM1303:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
When I was little, there was a picture of one of these on my "play room" wall and for the longest time I thought it was, in fact, an actual picture of a spaceship because the image was shot from the direct side angle so I couldn't see the V-shaped wings. Amazing how imaginations run wild at that age. JHMM1307:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I disagree, trialsanderrors. I think the angle is perfectly encyclopedic as it displays the famous V-shape of the aircraft. JHMM1307:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I don't think any of those pictures are a good picture of the B-2. One or two might be good pictures of the B-2 in the midst of a mid-air refueling, but none as striking as it alone in the sky from above. JHMM1309:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Just a comment: for me this pic demonstrates the most enc thing about this machine: it looks like something from outer space. :) --
TotoBaggins02:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose, nothing special compared to some of the other plane images we have. I think the image above is nicer and gives the plane (and its size) some context.
grenグレン08:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Support original - I've always liked the B-2, and yes, I see what you mean about the spaceship. I think the original looks far better because the bomber seems more 'atmospheric'.
Mrug221:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)reply