The list was kept by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 21:06:08 28 July 2019 (UTC) [1].
Article has been tagged for insufficient citations, while the lead is only two sentences long. This list could probably be merged into Scripps National Spelling Bee, really. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 11:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Comments – Much better now. Here are a few things I noticed from looking at the list, all minor:
Comments – Not gonna lie I'm actually very impressed with what you've done with this. Honestly didn't think this was salvageable, fantastic job! Here are a couple of things I'd add:
The list was kept by The Rambling Man via FACBot ( talk) 19:28:58 18 July 2019 (UTC) [2].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because I don't feel as if it meets the current criteria, having been promoted back in 2008. In particular, it has a failed verification tag, thus failing criterion 3b (Compherensiveness - citation). It also fails criterion 2 (Lead), bringing up stuff about the reign of Henry VIII that is not mentioned in the article. The lead also fails to mention the partisanship study in the body, which might (although this is speculation on my part) be in any case
WP:UNDUE weight. It also fails criterion 3 outright by neglecting information between Henry VII's reign and 1929, and has a current recentism tag that is still reasonable. The topic is fun and it gives me no great joy to say this, but overall I feel this article is closer to C-class and would require a fundamental rewrite to reach any sort of Featured status. I'd like to change my !vote to Keep following the recent improvements. –
John M Wolfson (
talk •
contribs)
23:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
reply
neglecting information between Henry VII's reign and 1929is an issue—as far as I can see the article makes it reasonably clear that it was only after 1929 that people started considering the name of the local cat significant—but other than that all your points appear to be spot-on. ‑ Iridescent 08:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
encyclopedia pages consisting of a lead section followed by a list (which may or may not be divided by headings)This article has two sections of prose after the intro, then an embedded list. The list represents a pretty small fraction of the article. Also, semantically, I'd say the thing this article is about is a position. It happens to also include a list of holders of that position. Colin M ( talk) 02:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 23:31:07 14 July 2019 (UTC) [3].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it no longer represents out best work. The addition of new sections since it became an FL are unsourced, as is much of the other new material added. SchroCat ( talk) 06:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC) reply
SchroCat any update on your feelings here, now we're around two and a half weeks down the road? Cheers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:36, 14 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Newyorkbrad any word on progress? The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Thanks Brad. I think it' pretty much there. TRM? - SchroCat ( talk) 15:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC) reply
plainrowheaders
in the wikitable class definition stops the main element of each row (defined by the "scope" tag) from being bold. In each row, start with a "!" rather than a "|" and keep the definition that single element on one line of the markup, simply adding scope="row"
. Bingo. Do that for each of the entries and you have a marked up table which screen readers can access too. Other details are available at
MOS:ACCESS, I think. Cheers.
The Rambling Man (
talk)
08:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
replyAlright, I think we're ready to close this as keep, unless anyone has any objections? The Rambling Man? -- Pres N 10:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 21:11:52 28 July 2019 (UTC) [4].
This may seem straightforward, the page is no longer a list like its reviewed version. The list is split at List of IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Champions. IWGP Tag Team Championship has the same problem, forgot to add that. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 18:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot ( talk) 21:17:56 28 July 2019 (UTC) [5].
The same problem as Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship/archive1. Its real list is List of IWGP Tag Team Champions. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 15:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC) reply