The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC) [1]. reply
This 2008 nomination has really suffered over the years:
Needs some TLC or should be delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC) reply
This nomination has sat here without much traction for a long time now. It also hasn't received any fixes. The fixes needed aren't that extreme, but since no one's doing them, this is notice that I'll be delisting it if nothing else happens pretty soon. -- Pres N 15:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Alright, delisting. -- Pres N 03:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC) [3]. reply
I am nominating this for featured list removal because large sections are outdated and incomplete. ~ HAL 333 04:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC) reply
This nomination has been sitting here without any traction for quite a while and will be closed soon; the specific issue here is that it's only been sporadically updated for the past decade, with the lead 14 years out of date now. I'd add that it was clearly never ever comprehensive- the lead says it's had 597 tenure-track professors, which is more than are listed in the tables, plus the tables also have some lecturers or visiting faculty, which would balloon the total count to thousands. It's not at all clear what the inclusion criteria was besides "could find on the internet", as several names don't have an associated article. Unless there's serious motion on this list soon, I'm going to close as delisted. -- Pres N 15:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Alright, delisting. -- Pres N 03:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC) reply