The list was kept by NapHit 13:31, 23 December 2012 [1].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because... the article is a bit of a mess, there's an error in the opening line for goodness sake ("one extended plays"). Sentences such as "Tisdale has also recorded a soundtrack album, six singles and several other releases as her High School Musical character Sharpay Evans" are messy and uncomfortable to read. Another error is the sentence "...reaching a top-forty peak position in Germany, Austria, Finland, Sweden and more". The last sentence about her album sales is completely unsourced. Chart positions have been fabricated (probably by an over-zealous fan), and quite frankly, music video directors by the names of "unknown" are unacceptable for a Featured List. The references have many, many errors, particularly with the works, publishers, and inconsistencies with dates. Till 08:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment not seeing too many major issues, and there's little or no interest in delisting this from the rest of the community, so I guess status quo should stand? The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment okay, another two weeks have passed, no further comment going on here, so I suggest this is (and I mean it this time) closed as kept. There's no consensus to delist it, my major issues were dealt with, let's move on. The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by Giants2008 19:21, 16 December 2012 [2].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it's plastered with maintenance tags... Also:
I know they're not major issues, but I need subject-matter experts to ensure the list is up to scratch. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments - good work. Some minor issues:
The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Any more opinions here? There's one delist that's pre-Malleus' work, and another on 3b grounds that I don't understand; a list of tallest buildings isn't ideal for a main city article. This is in no consensus territory right now, so hopefully some more reviewers will speak up. Giants2008 ( Talk) 18:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep per Malleus' great work to improve the article. Great job! TBr and ley 18:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Weak keep I'm really happy to see the list has been massively improved by Malleus and think the remaining tweaks are in the margins of whether or not we should delist. It would be better if we could reference everything perfectly, but that's not going to happen. I also fail to understand the "logic" behind Nergaal's 3b oppose, it makes no sense to me whatsoever. So, from all of that, I'd go for a keep.... The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by NapHit 13:31, 23 December 2012 [3].
This four-year featured list no longer meets the updated featured list requirements. Specific comments:
TBr and ley 04:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Delist per above and some other things I quickly noted:
Can't be interested in continuing this review, too much wrong and no sign of any interest it being fixed. The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Giants2008 19:28, 16 December 2012 [4].
This five and a half year old FL is seeing the wear of time. Specific issues:
Arsenikk (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Delist about half the article is a nest of "See also" articles, and the issues above seriously compromise this list's current "best Wikipedia can offer" tag. The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Delist. Agree with the nominator's concerns. Not one of the best lists Wikipedia has to offer. Till 00:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Gimmetoo 14:00, 15 December 2012 [5].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because... I almost fell out of my chair after seeing this mess of an article with the bronze star. The lead sentence should not be in bold, 'twenty three' should be hyphenated and 100 and 200 in Billboard charts should not be in italics. All I see is 'the band', 'the band', 'the band' repeating over and over. There is no-where near the required amount of referencing. The biggest killer is the state of the references, including inconsistencies with date formats (January 1, 2000 or 2000-01-01), incorrect works and publishers (billboard.com) and bare links for references 78-93. The album certifications use certifying bodies (ARIA) whereas the singles table uses the country's abbreviations (AUS). Till 08:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Delist a quick look...
The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Gimmetoo 14:00, 15 December 2012 [6].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it's fails on a number of counts:
The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC) reply