This list has way too many redlinks. There are 66 items in this list, and 38 redlinks. Doing the math reveals that this is actually a majority of the links on this page.
The References in the References section are actually explanatory footnotes.
It uses depreciated inline links as references.
How can a list that mentions in its lead that it is "an incomplete list" possibly be comprehensive?
Remove. I've done a lot of work on this and related lists and I still agree that this article does not meet the standards for a featured list. I wish it did, and frankly I really wish this list could get improved. But until it does, it's not feature-worthy. —Markles22:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Remove. I think enough's been said on the rationale for removal from the featured lists page, but …
The difficulty is that a few of the subcommittees do have pages: removing the links to the others looks a bit selective, to game the criteria. --
ALoan(Talk)09:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)reply