The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 18:36, 2 January 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list, because the list is fully complete, well structured, very accurate, easily navigable, and is categorized very well with an extensive amount of information. My only real concern is that the article may be too long at 115 kilobytes to meet specific criteria without being split into multiple articles (though the maximum length of an article is not really mentioned in the criteria). — Notorious4life ( talk) 06:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Some serious issues here that need to be fixed before I could considering supporting. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 14:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Per the lack of references. Ruslik_ Zero 19:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose, this list is a nice starting point and has potential, but some critical elements are still lacking. The most obvious is the complete lack of references. Some other comments:
<sup>2</sup>
that produces 2.Arsenikk (talk) 12:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC) reply