The list was promoted by Dabomb87 17:36, 19 February 2012 [1].
List of culinary nuts ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list after rewriting it to bring it up to FL quality. This is part of an effort to contribute more articles to the Food & Drink FL category. Waitak ( talk) 18:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( Talk) 18:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments quick ones at the moment.
The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply
|
Comment Everything looks in order just one thing I noticed, you need to format=PDF
to the refs that are PDF's.
NapHit (
talk)
22:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Done
reply
Resolved comments from WFC |
---|
Comments from WFC Notwithstanding the comments here, I love this list and hope it becomes an FL.
— WFC— 00:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply
|
Comments
-- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 18:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The table I considered more carefully. I concluded that length of history as a culinary nut or amount of annual worldwide production are unlikely to be known for many nuts, and that having a column for the plant name is often pointless, as in many cases the scientific name and the name of the plant are interchangeable. I agree that each entry should ideally have a geographic element to it, but think prose is a more flexible way of doing this than a table column. For some nuts the true "origin" won't be known. For others, an origin it might give a misleading picture of modern-day production (English walnut for example).
The specific outstanding things that concern me are: