Comment. I'm not sure what the relevant naming conventions for music awards are, if any, but "List of Ludacris awards" is a rather misleading title for those not aware that there is an artist named Ludacris, as it will be easily misread as meaning "list of unthinkably stupid awards". --
erachimatalk 06:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Hmm, I hadn't thought of it the way the concerned editors above and below me clearly did. Yeah, it probably needs clarification.
The Rambling Man (
talk) 16:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)reply
If we've got a few people behind it then I'd be willing to change it; right now, though, I can't tell if it's the more popular title or not. GaryKing (
talk) 14:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - based on meeting the FL criteria, but I think a move is necessary since it sounds like Ludacris is an award itself.SRX 23:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - Nice, clean list which is comprehensive. REZTERTALKø 12:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Very fragmented; no chance of conflating into a single table?
Tony(talk) 08:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Well could be done, but again, there are dozens of previously nominated FLs that use this format so I'd rather stick with this format unless we have a big discussion on changing it. GaryKing (
talk) 17:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Otherwise, sources look okay, other links checked out with the
link checker tool.
Both done. E! Online has had a huge update recently where most of the URLs on their website don't work anymore, gah. GaryKing (
talk) 14:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.