Support I was perusing the recent new pages, and saw this. Boy was I surprised to see that it was also an FL candidate! Looks great, can't think of any critiques. -
LelandRB (
Chat ·
contribs) 03:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not sure if this can be considered "stable" enough to be at FLC yet, Gary. As mentioned above, the page isn't an hour old yet.
Matthewedwards (
talk •
contribs •
email) 04:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
I don't think the age of an article is related to its stability. GaryKing (
talk) 04:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Comments Sources look good. I have to agree with Matthewedwards about instability. While the age of an article doesn't entirely relate to stability, it would be nice if it sat in the mainspace for a few days, just to break it in. Also, would you mind holding back until a few of your nominations close before nominating more? You have a couple dozen FLCs up, and it's a tad difficult for reviewers like myself that try to comment on every FLC. Cheers, –
JuliancoltonTropicalCyclone 15:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Review by SrX
Comments
. She won two MTV Video Music Awards in 2005, including Best Choreography for "Hollaback Girl" and Best Art Direction for "What You Waiting For?" - Hollaback Girl is already linked before this sentence, don't
overlink.
What raised her to prominence as a solo singer?--SRX 20:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - review addressed to meet
WP:WIAFL.--SRX 20:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Support You've got these articles down to a science.
Dabomb87 (
talk) 01:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Support - SRX got the prose comments again, good job. iMatthew (
talk) 21:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Comment
Lead section: "including "Hollaback Girl", which peaked at number one, and "The Sweet Escape", which peaked at number two.[3]." Maybe you could change the second "which" for another word, maybe climbing or reaching (I have the same issue on my lists).
For the rest, very good job.SupportJaespinoza (
talk) 04:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)reply