As of 2 July 2024, 10:15 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. A FAR coordinator will advance or close this nomination when consensus is reached.
I have
nominated the article for TFA, but it was unsuccessful. It stated: "article would not pass FAC in current state. Suggest waiting until 60th birthday (which is a more notable anniversary than 55th) to re-run the article as TFA, after which improvements would have been made." On the talk page, I asked for article issues, but no response was made in the past 2 weeks. Please take your time to review and I would like to address the article's concerns. ScarletViolet (
talk •
contribs)
00:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
UPDATE March 23, 2024 This FAR has been reopened and please take your time to re-review this featured article. According to
Heartfox, some of the article's sources are not high-quality reliable.
@
ScarletViolet: As was noted in the TFA discussion, if there is to be an FAR for this article, specific concerns have to be identified on the article's talk page as a first step - I don't see that that was done?
Nikkimaria (
talk)
00:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
For the benefit of reviewers, I'm going to copy Heartfox's comment from the talk page here: "Mainly issues with
WP:FACR 1c, and probably others would take issue with 1a. There are some websites that aren't high-quality sources for a biography (or really anything) like TheThings, Fame10, Nicki Swift, Daily Mirror, Gossip Cop, Daily Express, etc. Also, the most significant scholarly work on Carey (Why Mariah Carey Matters by Andrew Chan) isn't cited, as are two recent academic book chapters (
ISBN978-1538169063 and
ISBN978-1-5013-6825-7)."
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
03:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply