The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 4:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it largely relies on a single source, which has been described in multiple academic reviews as heavily biased and unscientific (see the relevant section on the talk page). This article presents a very one-sided and quite possibly ahistorical view of the subject. It was granted featured status about 15 years ago, when standards on Wikipedia were much lower. In short, the article does not meet the FA criteria 1c (well-researched) and 1d (neutral). Dylanvt ( talk) 13:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply
I have a few comments from some spot checks: