The article was removed by User:Marskell 13:31, 7 July 2008 [1].
This article achieved FA status in 2006 and as you can imagine has changed significantly since then. The following issues are identified:
Hopefully this article doesn't need too much work but the magnitude of the change since 2005 and the tightening of FA criteria since then justifies a review. -- Joowwww ( talk) 11:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply
We can work on all these criteria, but other than requesting article protection and semi-protection, ultimately we can't stop editors from edit-warring and vandalising an FA article (Criterion 1e). Hong Qi Gong ( Talk - Contribs) 15:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Someone seriously messed up the page. I don't know how to fix it! Protodude1337 ( talk) 23:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply
CommentI don't see huge problems here; needs a ce and a few more refs is all really. Can this be left open for a week or two. Ceoil ( talk) 14:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply