The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot ( talk) 5:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because I think it falls considerably short of FA standards, and personally I wouldn't pass it through GA in its current condition. I raised issue regarding it at WikiProject Video games and the two people who replied there both expressed concerns about the article. The original FA nominator, David Fuchs, has also been made aware of the listing via a discussion on the article's talk page. A commentator at Project video games raised concerns was about the plot length. The article was passed in 2008 when I can only presume standards were lower; I'd argue by today's standards it fails on FA criteria 1a, 1b and 1c. Specific issues listed below.
|publisher=
field is redundant for all the {{
cite web}} instances. That field was designed for book publishers. The |work=
field alone is sufficient almost always, especially if the work is a linked entity with its own article.