As of 12 July 2024, 08:41 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. A FAR coordinator will advance or close this nomination when consensus is reached.
I am nominating this featured article for review because of self-published content being used as well as some
WP:NOTGUIDEBOOK style content on grooming and training that isn't breed specific, more detail about the latter on the talk page.
Traumnovelle (
talk)
01:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The article is already featured, I'm nominating it due to the self-published and citation needed tag. I think the article just has a few issues that need sorting to retain the status. I notified you due to you having the most contributions whilst still being active on Wikipedia. Unfortunately the editor who did the work to get this article up to featured quality has quit.
Traumnovelle (
talk)
08:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Tail docking claim is still unsourced (I've tagged it).
The claim about all Australian states and territories banning it since 2004 is not supported by the source: I've changed it to remove the 'has been illegal since 2004' in favour of 'is illegal'.
'While an Australian Cattle Dog generally works silently, it will
bark in alarm or to attract attention.' is still unsourced as the study is about the later general claim about barking and not dogs specifically.
The deafness claim was still made to a self-published source: I've rectified it by citing the original study
The non-breed specific and guidebook content is still in: If no one objects I will remove this
So overall just the claim about tail docking in the US and how the dogs use their bark whilst working need citing and the guidebook/non-breed specific content should be removed.
I've trimmed the grooming and training paragraphs, only issue that would disqualify this from being a featured article are the two citation needed tags.
Traumnovelle (
talk)
09:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I was only able to add a citation for one, I don't have access to any library sources (both offline and online) currently, although I doubt I'd be able to cite everyone even if I were back home.
Traumnovelle (
talk)
17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Popping in briefly -- the best I've been able to find for tail docking is
the UKC standard, which states "The tail is customarily not docked, however, a docked tail should not be penalized.",
the American Stock Dog Registry, which says that tail docking is "optional", and the book
The Perfect Puppy which states that tail docking is "often" practiced in the US. This is searching online sources only, I'm at work and don't have easy access to my books. Doesn't quite support the statement as written, but perhaps something like "In the United States, the tail may be docked, while it is illegal, except in special circumstances, in Australia ...", though this leaves the open question of the tail status elsewhere.
Rusalkii (
talk)
20:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)reply