The article was delisted. Nikkimaria ( talk) 19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Agatha Christie: And Then There Were None ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this featured article for review after auditing the article and raising several issues at the talk page. The major glaring problem is with the prose, which is full of awkward, dense and redundant syntax. The Gameplay section is poorly organised and difficult for non-players to follow, because many game mechanics aren't explained clearly and the section wanders off into irrelevant development facts that are in the wrong section. The plot is unsourced and disproportionately long. The reception section is too brief and and poorly organised. There are dead links and inconsistent date formatting. The lead is broken up into five choppy paragraphs when it should be ~3. CR4ZE ( t • c) 14:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment: I can't formally tack down a Delist vote yet, but I agree that this page doesn't come close to FA-compliant. Tezero ( talk) 21:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment: This page is currently being edited by the GOCE. Let's see how that goes and then reassess the article. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 21:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Comment: It's in very bad shape, but it doesn't seem irredeemable. Sourcing has a ton of bad links that need archiving, as well as a few dodgy outlets that could be replaced, but none of that would require a major rewrite. Given the massive GOCE copyedit going on right now, I think this article might have a chance. JimmyBlackwing ( talk) 23:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply