The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 23:46, 9 January 2009 [1].
The first thing that will likely stand out with this article, is it's small size. However, size doesn't always matter, and when size may be lacking, quality sticks out. This article has been through several copyedits, a peer review, and has been fully reviewed by the editors of WP:WPTC. All thoughts and comments are encouraged and welcome. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 04:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment - Looks good so far. I've only done a brief look through, but I'll be back later with more comments. VX! ~~~ 18:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
– Juliancolton Happy Holidays 19:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments on the prose and requests for clarification.
I enjoyed reading this article but I need to see more reviews before supporting this FAC. Thanks. Graham Colm Talk 15:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
I'm not seeing the personal investment in simple measures to improve your prose: the hurrican project and WP more broadly need you to do this. To start with, try these exercises on hyphens and dashes. Tony (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC) reply