The article was not promoted 00:11, 12 May 2007.
Self-nomination. I've worked this article from up Start-Class to GA. It's been in peer review for over a week with no response, so I decided to proceed to FAC. These games have an interesting history and it was rewarding to take the pieces of the puzzle and combine them into a coherent narrative. Looking forward to any comments that will help improve the article further. Pagra shtak 14:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Thoughts on merge: This should definitely not be one article. While this might mean more work to clean them up and make them two good articles, the fact is they are two seperate games, albeit with interlocking stories. The
Pokémon analogy doesn't work here because Seasons and Ages are not the exact same game with different creatures: they have different characters, different dungeons, different items, et al. While I admit it makes tying the two together harder, they deserve their own articles, as articles can be written about each.
David Fuchs(
talk /
frog blast the vent core!)
21:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC) See below, 21:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
reply
I've merged the articles. I apologize, Dwaipayan, your comment had not been written when I started working on the merge and I just noticed it. I do think that the article is better merged. One could argue that each Pokemon game is self-contained, but we have several articles that each cover a pair, and rightfully so. Pagra shtak 06:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply
I could use some help with the interlanguage links. Almost every other language has separate articles. I've dumped them all into the article, which gives two links on the side for those languages that have two articles; I'm not sure of the proper way to handle this. Pagra shtak 06:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC) reply
(deindent)That's only of use to the player. Wikipedia articles should in general avoid referencing specific buttons. You may want to read Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. Pagra shtak 19:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC) reply