The article was promoted 15:17, 8 May 2008.
previous FAC (00:34, 18 April 2008)
Yes, this article was just here, but I have used the previous FAC as a peer review to improve the article, and believe I have addressed the commenters' concerns. There is much that is new about this article. Please let me know what more can be improved, or anything from the previous FAC that is still not satisfactory. This article is part of a current featured topic nomination.
Pagra
shtak
16:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Support Really, a nicely written article. My only concern is that there seems to be a large amount of images on the article, and they seem cluttered together. I'm not so certain that they are all necessary. -- haha169 ( talk) 22:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 17:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Weak Oppose
Buc ( talk) 09:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Pagra shtak 14:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Uneasy about this one. This is much improved in the prose compared with this genre a year ago. But I'm not entirely satisfied yet.
Comments. Good to see the NPOV stuff sorted above.
Prose seems to improve in the latter part of the article. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 06:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC) reply